http://www.defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20110531_05
"Key factor in defeating terrorism was political leadership"- Secretary Defence
www.defence.lk">Political leadership has always been the key factor in defeating terrorism; the President had the clear aim and commitment to rescue the country from terrorism once and for all, said Secretary Defence.
"Over the years, there had been many attempts at militarily defeating the LTTE, but none of these campaigns had met with lasting success. The most distinctive feature of the Humanitarian Operations launched in 2006 was the clear aim and commitment of the President to rescue the country from terrorism once and for all." stated Secretary Defence Mr. Gotabaya Rajapaksa, delivering the keynote address at the International defence symposium at Colombo today( May 31).
Four previous Presidents as well as several successive Governments comprising various political parties had grappled with the issue without success, the Secretary reiterated.
"Over the years, a range of different approaches including military campaigns, peace talks, and even international mediation had been tried. None had worked", he said.
The aim of this seminar is to share the Sri Lanka's experience in overcoming terrorism. During the seminar many of the field commanders involved in the operations will discuss the strategies and tactics used to achieve victory.
"At a time when so many countries the world over are facing the problems posed by domestic and international terrorism, we believe that sharing the lessons learnt from the Sri Lankan experience in combating terrorist tactics, providing humanitarian assistance and dealing with political and international factors is important. It is our earnest hope that these lessons will help our friends and allies in the international community defeat international terrorism", the Secretary further emphasized.
Full text of the keynote address delivered by Secretary Defence Mr. Gotabaya Rajapksa at the 'Defeating Terrorism- The Sri Lanka Experience' symposium on 31st May, 2011.
DEFEATING TERRORISM-THE SRI LANKAN EXPERIENCE
BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
MR. GOTABAYA RAJAPAKSA RWP RSP psc MSc
It is a pleasure and a privilege for me to address you at the Opening Ceremony of the seminar organised by the Sri Lanka Army: "Defeating Terrorism-The Sri Lankan Experience". This seminar takes place at an opportune moment, just two years after this country's victory over the brutal terrorism of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, better known as the LTTE. On behalf of the Government of Sri Lanka, I am particularly proud to welcome our distinguished foreign delegates and other invited guests.
Sri Lanka's experience in overcoming terrorism is the theme of this seminar. Over the next few days, you will meet many of the field commanders involved in the operations, who will be able to discuss the tactics used to achieve victory. At a time when so many countries the world over are facing the problems posed by domestic and international terrorism, we believe that sharing the lessons learnt from the Sri Lankan experience in combating terrorist tactics, providing humanitarian assistance and dealing with political and international factors is important. It is our earnest hope that these lessons will help our friends and allies in the international community defeat international terrorism.
Sri Lanka's experience with terrorism began in the 1970s. When His Excellency the President Mahinda Rajapaksa assumed office in December 2005, terrorist activities in Sri Lanka had dragged on for nearly thirty years. Four previous Presidents as well as several successive Governments comprising various political parties had grappled with the issue without success. Over the years, a range of different approaches including military campaigns, peace talks, and even international mediation had been tried. None had worked. With a large global financial network, highly developed offensive capabilities and no genuine interest in peace, the LTTE was a stubborn, hostile and formidable foe.
Over the years, the LTTE had grown from a small organisation of armed individuals to a large, sophisticated terrorist outfit with very advanced combat capabilities. At its height, the LTTE had more than 30,000 battle-hardened cadres; access to large stockpiles of modern armaments, ammunition and equipment; a sophisticated naval wing and a fledgling air wing. By 2005, the LTTE controlled almost a quarter of the country's territory and approximately two thirds of its coastline. Under an internationally brokered Cease Fire Agreement, the LTTE even maintained the illusion of a state apparatus in the areas under its control.
It must be understood that notwithstanding this, the LTTE was one of the deadliest terrorist organisations in the world. The list of the LTTE's atrocities is long. Over the years, the LTTE carried out ethnic cleansing in the North and East, brutally driving out the Sinhalese and Muslim civilians who lived there. They carried out countless attacks on civilians. They attacked villages near the areas they occupied, massacring thousands. They attacked places of worship such as the Sri Maha Bhodiya and the Temple of the Tooth, the two most significant places of worship for Buddhists all over the world. They also carried out massacres at Mosques and attacked churches.
The LTTE attacked vital national infrastructure such as the international airport, the central bus stand and the main railway station in Colombo. They attacked economic targets such as the Central Bank, the World Trade Centre, oil refineries and civilian harbours. They set off countless parcel bombs, car bombs, truck bombs and claymore mines in populated areas, killing thousands of innocent civilians, and they perfected the tactic of suicide bombing. The LTTE also carried out a vicious campaign of assassinations against political targets, killing the President of Sri Lanka, the former Prime Minister of India, the Defence Minister, the Foreign Minister, several cabinet ministers, leaders of political parties, and a large number of parliamentarians.
These are all the hallmarks of a brutal, ruthless and unrestrained terrorist organisation. The impact of the LTTE's atrocities throughout Sri Lanka resulted in untold suffering for our entire population. In the areas outside the LTTE's control, ordinary peoples' day-to-day lives were transformed by terrorism. Parents did not travel together in the same vehicle for fear of orphaning their children by getting caught in a bomb blast. Students' school attendance dropped every time rumours spread about impending terrorist attacks. Law and order deteriorated as terrorism fostered crime and corruption. The underworld became more powerful and its members gained access to arms and ammunition from the various armed groups operating in the country at large. In brief, an entire generation grew up under a veil of fear. There was a complete disruption to civilian life in the entire nation.
In the areas under the LTTE's dominance, life was very much worse. The LTTE were no freedom fighters on behalf of a beleaguered populace. On the contrary, they were a vicious group of terrorists that kept the people in the regions they dominated under a brutal dictatorship. The LTTE did not tolerate any opposition. The LTTE assassinated the leaders of other armed groups in these areas, and wiped out any group members who refused to support its cause. The LTTE also assassinated moderate democratic leaders and influential public intellectuals in the Tamil community, and kept the people under their dominance trapped in a state of fear.
For its part, the Sri Lankan Government did everything it could to maintain the supply of necessary services such as electricity, water, healthcare and education to the people in these areas. Unfortunately, the LTTE did not allow these services to be properly used. As a result, while the rest of the country developed, the areas under the LTTE stagnated. This stagnation was not only economic but also socio-political. Although the LTTE claimed to maintain a police force, judicial system and the other trappings of a state apparatus during the time the Cease Fire Agreement was in force, these were feeble attempts to disguise a territory held under gunpoint. No one in those areas was safe; no one was free.
Rescuing the hundreds of thousands of innocent Sri Lankans suffering under the fist of the LTTE's brutal fascism was a key priority of the President when he was elected by the people to office in 2005. He was given a very clear mandate by the people to solve the terrorist problem once and for all and win an honourable peace for Sri Lanka. As such, he invited the LTTE for direct talks and attempted to restart the stalled negotiations.
Typically, the LTTE responded by intensifying their campaign of provocation. They blatantly violated the Cease Fire Agreement then in place. They attacked key military targets, including our highest ranked personnel, and continued attacking innocent civilians. The claymore mines set off at Kabethigollawa, and other attacks at various locations all around the country killed hundreds of innocent children, women and men. The Government bore these provocations with patience, but the final straw was when the LTTE shut down the sluice gates at Maavilaru, a key irrigation channel for agriculture in the East. This inhumane act cut off water to thousands of acres of agricultural land, as well as over five thousand households and threatened a humanitarian disaster. The Government could not allow this situation to worsen, and the Government was forced to resort to a military campaign to open the Maavilaru sluice gates.
Over the years, there had been many attempts at militarily defeating the LTTE, but none of these campaigns had met with lasting success. The most distinctive feature of the Humanitarian Operations launched in 2006 was the clear aim and commitment of the President to rescue the country from terrorism once and for all.
Having a clear, unambiguous aim is absolutely vital, as no successful operation can be launched if any doubt lingers in the minds of the personnel entrusted to achieve it. In the past, the military had pushed forward with great success on many occasions only to be prevented from consolidating these successes to a permanent victory due to external factors. In contrast, when our Humanitarian Operation began in 2006, the military understood that the President's commitment to eradicating terrorism was unshakeable. His statements and actions during the Humanitarian Operations proved this beyond doubt not only to the military, but to the entire population. As importantly, there was no change in his resoluteness from the first day of the operations to the last.
The committed leadership displayed by the President was also absolutely vital. For the duration of the Humanitarian Operations, over three and a half years, the President chaired the weekly Security Council meetings, where the debrief for the past week and the plans for the coming week were discussed. By constantly keeping in touch with the unfolding situation, the President, as Commander in Chief, was fully cognisant of the great progress being made. When there were setbacks, as there can be in any military operation, he understood that they were only temporary.
During the course of the operations, in the face of increasing military casualties and mounting international criticism, no matter how unfounded, the President stood firm and absorbed all these pressures. As Commander in Chief, his resolute stance gave our personnel the confidence to press ahead with their operations. He never faltered from the ultimate goal.
The President also reacted very promptly in crisis situations. When the LTTE's claymore mine attack on a bus killed close to 70 innocent civilians at Kebethigollawa, a village in the North Central Province very close to LTTE dominated territory, he went to the scene immediately. Though the situation was tense, he visited the mortuary, spoke to the bereaved as well as the other people in the affected area. He immediately instructed the local commander to strengthen defences around such threatened villages to prevent further LTTE atrocities.
Similarly, when the LTTE developed its light low-flying aircraft that threatened vital installations as well as civilians in Colombo during night raids, the President personally supervised the rehearsals of new air defence system that was installed at Katunayake Air Base to counter this threat. Such examples of commitment and leadership at the very top gave a lot of confidence to the entire country during this difficult period.
The President's personal commitment to the success of the Humanitarian Operation went above and beyond the call of duty. In the East, when the LTTE dominated town of Vakarai was liberated, he went to the town to congratulate our troops even though the East had not been completely cleared. He also visited the key town of Kilinochchi, which had been the LTTE's stronghold in the North, as soon as it was liberated. This was a landmark victory during the course of the war, and although the Northern Operation was still in progress, the President went there to speak to the troops. Such acts gave our military personnel every encouragement as well as the confidence to press ahead and see the Humanitarian Operation through to its conclusion.
There were many key factors that led to the success of the Humanitarian Operations. Perhaps the most important and critical factor was the President's decision to expand the Armed Forces. One of the first things we realised when we studied the previous military campaigns was that the Sri Lankan military was always superior to the LTTE. Our talented commanders and dedicated personnel most often succeeded in their encounters with the enemy. Specialised regiments such as the Special Forces and the Commandos had developed a very high level of skill and professionalism over the years, and were more than capable of defeating the LTTE in single battles. However, there just were not enough troops in the Armed Forces to consolidate these wins in battle to achieve final victory in the war.
The primary reason for this was the sheer extent of land that the LTTE was active in and the guerrilla tactics it used to dominate them. These included the Eastern Province, of which one third was controlled by the LTTE; the Jaffna peninsular, islands and the Mahumalai Forward Defence Lines which were under Government control, but in which the LTTE was also active; and the Wanni, which was a vast jungle terrain fully dominated and controlled by the LTTE. Due to the LTTE's terrorist activities, the rest of the country also needed attention.
In the Jaffna peninsular, islands and the Forward Defence Lines at Mahumali, there were approximately forty thousand troops already deployed. It was necessary to hold these positions in strength. Once the Eastern Province was cleared, it was equally essential to hold the territory in strength to prevent the LTTE from infiltrating it again. It should be noted that at the time, the LTTE leader proclaimed that the defeat in the East was only a temporary tactical withdrawal. This is because Government forces had cleared the Eastern Province in the past, only for the LTTE to return in numbers and reoccupy and restart terrorism there while the military was actively engaged elsewhere. A repetition of this was avoided because we had enough personnel on the ground to hold and dominate the territory.
When it came to the Wanni, it was necessary for the military to operate on a number of different axes and on a wider frontage. During past operations, one of the major LTTE tactics was to penetrate the front line of the military, infiltrate our territory and attack from the rear. It was necessary to strongly hold the rear and have several counter penetration lines to guard against this tactic.
It was also absolutely essential that we have enough troops to guard against the threat posed by LTTE suicide cadres and operatives who had infiltrated the rest of the country. It was absolutely essential to secure key infrastructure in and around Colombo, such as the international airport, the harbour and the oil refinery. It was equally important to prevent LTTE's attacks on civilians, and several operations were carried out to identify and neutralise terrorist cells.
The President had the will and courage to take the difficult decision to expand the military to the size required to win an extended campaign in the North and East whilst also protecting the rest of the country. The combined strength of the Armed Forces in 2005 was nowhere near the number that was actually required for a serious campaign to eradicate the LTTE. This fact was clearly understood by the President, and the decision was made to expand the strength of the military.
By projecting its intentions very clearly to the public, the Government encouraged a lot of young people to step forward and join the Armed Forces. They did so because they understood that the political leadership had both the clear aim of eradicating terrorism, and the will necessary to achieve it. Between the end of 2005 and the end of 2009, the Army's 9 Divisions were increased to 20; its 44 Brigades expanded to 71 and its 149 Battalions increased to 284. This was a large, but essential expansion that increased the number of Army personnel from 120,000 in 2005 to over 200,000 by the end of the Humanitarian Operation.
The Navy and the Air Force were also expanded significantly, and they were also given tasks beyond their classic role. Many of their personnel were entrusted with holding ground even in jungles, and also given the responsibility of securing Main Supply Routes.
These measures were essential to safeguard peace in the rest of the country and ensure that operations could be adequately supported to proceed uninterrupted. In past years, whenever a military operation was being carried out successfully, the LTTE would seek to distract the military by attacking innocent civilians in non-combat areas. Particularly through their perfecting of the suicide-bombing tactic, the LTTE were able to create chaos in the rest of the country while military operations were going on in the north and east. When this happened, pressure traditionally built on the Government to pause the military campaign and seek alternate solutions. By expanding the Army, Navy and Air Force, and using paramilitary forces like the Special Task Force of the Police, and by increasing the responsibilities of the Police itself, we addressed this situation without halting our progress. By safeguarding the rest of the country, the Humanitarian Operation could go ahead uninterrupted.
Another critical factor in this regard was formalising the Civil Defence Force. This was initially a loose organisation of civilians who had been given only shotguns to protect the villages under threat from the LTTE. When the decision to once again engage the LTTE militarily was made, it was clear that the LTTE would try to distract the operations by attacking more innocent civilians in these villages. Therefore it was necessary to formally organise these civilians into a proper paramilitary force capable of protecting vulnerable villages. 42,000 able bodied men were recruited from the villages and given proper training as well as equipment. They played a significant role in protecting their villages from LTTE attacks during the course of the Humanitarian Operations.
Alongside the commitment of the President and the political hierarchy to the Humanitarian Operations, it was equally essential that the Government itself have the stability to see the campaign through to its conclusion.
This was a particular issue for the President and the key political leadership because the then Government comprised a coalition that had only a tenuous majority in parliament. If the Government had collapsed at any point during the military campaign, all our efforts would have been in vain. The President managed this issue by keeping his party's coalition partners together and persuading opposition figures to support him and consolidate the party's position in parliament. For this reason, the cabinet had to be increased to a historic size, and various portfolios were handed over to notable party members within the coalition. There was a great deal of criticism for this at the time, but it was an absolutely necessary step in maintaining the Government's stability and political stability.
Even more important than maintaining political stability was generating popular support. By 2005, the Sri Lankan population had gone from war to peace and back again. There was a lot of cynicism and war weariness in the public at large. If the Government had focused only on the war, it was entirely possible that the people would not have supported the war effort. This is one of the reasons why the Government invested so much on welfare efforts, even at a time when it could hardly afford to because of the large war budget.
A sterling example of the thought given to the well being of ordinary Sri Lankans was the fertiliser subsidy granted at a time when international prices were skyrocketing. This eased the heavy burden felt by Sri Lankan farmers, and kept food prices affordable to the general population.
It should also not be forgotten that Sri Lanka had been ravaged by the Asian tsunami only two years before the military campaign was resumed. There was a lot of rebuilding that had not yet been completed. In addition, a lot of infrastructure development, particularly in power generation and the upgrading of the road networks, was necessary to spur economic growth. The President and the Government did not ignore these responsibilities. Instead, they skilfully engaged in multifocal governance, where the other critical national requirements were met while the focus on the military campaign was not in any way reduced.
Along with these domestic issues, another key factor underpinning the success of our operations was the management of international pressures by the political leadership. In 1987, the enormously successful Vadamarachchi Operations had pushed the LTTE to the brink of defeat. However, these operations could not be sustained because the Indian Government intervened. The primary problem in 1987 was that the relationship between the two countries had not been managed very effectively.
In contrast, from the time of his election, President Rajapaksa went out of his way to keep New Delhi briefed about all the new developments taking place in Sri Lanka. He understood that while other countries could mount pressure on us through diplomatic channels or economic means, only India could influence the military campaign.
From very early in the Humanitarian Operations, the relationship between Sri Lanka and India was managed through maintaining a clear communications line at the very highest level. A special committee was established to engage in constant dialogue. The Sri Lankan side comprised then Senior Advisor to the President Basil Rajapaksa, Secretary to the President Lalith Weeratunga, and myself, as Defence Secretary. The Indian side comprised former National Security Advisor M. K. Narayan, then Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon and then Defence Secretary Vijay Singh. This troika had continuous discussions and ensured that whenever any sensitive issues arose, they would be resolved immediately.
The Government also ensured that our relationships with other important regional allies and other friendly countries were well maintained through usual diplomatic channels and regular dialogue. Ultimately this able management of critical international relations was another key success factor in the eradication of terrorism.
Unfortunately, it has to be noted that influential figures in a few countries outside the region were sceptical about the Government's decision to reopen a military campaign against the LTTE. There were many reasons for this. A key reason was a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of the LTTE and the necessity to eradicate it.
I spoke earlier about the numerous atrocities and human rights violations carried out by the LTTE. Unfortunately, the LTTE also had a great deal of global influence through some elements of the Tamil diaspora, which played a significant role in the electoral politics of certain western nations. This influence, combined with the skill of the LTTE propaganda machine, was strong enough to create a false, competing narrative in which the LTTE assumed the guise of a liberation army for an oppressed population. This is far from the truth.
While it is true that the LTTE's first major attack on an Army convoy in 1983 sparked riots in the south during which the Tamil community suffered at the hands of violent mobs, Sri Lanka as a nation grew up very rapidly after that incident and left those dark days far behind. The progress made in national reconciliation and integration since 1983 has been very encouraging for a long time. Even at the height of terrorist activity in the 1990s, when thousands of innocent men, women and children were killed on a yearly basis by the LTTE's bomb blasts and attacks, there were no more backlashes against the Tamil community.
On the contrary, the majority of the Tamil population has lived outside the North and East for many years, and comprise an integral part of the Sri Lankan community and the national identity. Colombo, in particular, is a thriving multi-ethnic hub that boasts a large Tamil population, which has produced many of the nation's leading professionals and businessmen. They lead lives of distinction in a supportive multicultural environment devoid of communal tension, and have done so for many years.
Nevertheless, the LTTE's propaganda machine kept flogging the lie that the Tamil community would have no chance to prosper so long as it stayed within the Sri Lankan state. They demonised Sri Lankan society, particularly the majority Sinhalese, and made ludicrous claims about ethnic cleansing and genocide. The irony is that in actual fact, it was the LTTE itself that perpetrated such atrocities in its attempts to carve out an insular mono-ethnic state. It was the LTTE that drove the Sinhalese and Muslims out of the North virtually overnight, and it was the LTTE that held Tamils captive and made them suffer for so many years.
If any Tamil children did not have the opportunity to study and forge better lives for themselves, it was because they lived in LTTE controlled territory and were conscripted as frontline soldiers or suicide bombers at the tender age of twelve, thirteen or fourteen. If any Tamil families spent many sleepless nights fearing for their future, it was because they lived under the LTTE and had no prospects at all for a better life. If successful Tamil businessmen and professionals were forced to maintain a low profile in the rest of the country, it was because they feared being kidnapped and held for ransom by LTTE operatives.
The bane of the Tamil community in Sri Lanka was not the Sinhalese, nor the Armed Forces, nor the Government: it was in fact the LTTE. That is ultimately why we called our efforts to liberate the North and East a Humanitarian Operation-we were not just liberating territory from the LTTE's control; we were rescuing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians from its cruel grip. By combating the LTTE and conclusively defeating it, we were not just winning a long drawn out war against an old enemy; we were rescuing an entire nation from the constant threat and hellish horrors of terrorism.
A second problem that some observers in the international community had with the resumption of a military campaign in Sri Lanka was the issue of proportionality. These observers unfortunately lacked the perspective necessary to understand the true nature of the LTTE. They thought of the LTTE as a small organisation, essentially no more than an underdog standing up to the full might of a national military. Again, the LTTE's propaganda machine played an important role in this fuelling this misconception.
The truth of the matter is that despite its modus operandi of terrorism, and its origins as a small band of militants, the LTTE had grown into a massive terrorist organisation that had the ability to stand up to the Sri Lankan Armed Forces over the years. On previous occasions, the LTTE had enjoyed several victories over our military. They had overrun the Pooneryn military camp in 1993 and the Mullaitivu military camp in 1996, killing several thousand troops. From 1998 to 1999, the LTTE scored several key victories against the Armed Forces, killing thousands of troops and recapturing a great deal of territory. In the year 2000, the LTTE captured Elephant Pass, which was held by 12,000 soldiers, in a major operation.
All in all, by the time our military campaign resumed in 2005, the LTTE had killed more than 26,000 armed services personnel. This was no small band of militants, but a large, sophisticated terrorist organisation comprising approximately 30,000 cadres, a very large arsenal of weapons and equipment, and thousands of civilians organised as auxiliary forces. The LTTE is the only terrorist organisation in the world to have had a sophisticated naval wing as well as a fledgling air force with aircraft capable of dropping bombs on Colombo. Those who thought that the Sri Lankan response was disproportionate had absolutely no perspective on the issue.
Unfortunately, because Sri Lanka is a small country with limited resources, it was not possible for us to give the management of non-critical foreign opinion the same level of attention we gave India and other key nations. As such, these misconceptions remained largely intact. Even more sadly, a number of influential figures in the international community formed very strong opinions-or should I say jumped to very hasty conclusions-about our conduct of the war. Some of these assumptions and misunderstandings have proven hard to shake even to this day. This is deeply disappointing to the Government because one of the most important facets of the Sri Lankan war against terrorism was the immense care with which it was conducted.
Ensuring zero civilian casualties was an overriding priority for everyone involved in the humanitarian operations, from the political leadership to the military personnel on the field of battle. Training on human rights, international humanitarian law and the law of armed conflict as well as highlighting the necessity to protect civilians has been integral to the training syllabi of the Sri Lankan Armed Forces for many years. Moreover, when the operations commenced, strict orders were given to the military at Security Council meetings to avoid civilian losses and minimise destruction of civilian property. These orders were included in the operational orders handed down through the chain of command, and all our military personnel on the ground were very conscious of the fact that civilian casualties would not be acceptable.
Of course, in keeping with its brutal nature, the LTTE did its best to make these orders hard to follow. Historically, the LTTE has made sure that its leaders, operational centres, and gun positions are all located within areas populated by civilians. As our operations progressed, and the LTTE lost battle after battle, they started to withdraw from these entrenched positions in the towns and villages. Instead of withdrawing their cadres alone however, they herded the civilians who lived in those areas alongside them as they retreated. They also mined the villages and towns they left behind, making sure no one could safely go back.
A couple of hundred thousand civilians were taken out of their homes and driven from their villages as the military campaign progressed. These civilians were to serve as a human shield for the LTTE, which was beginning to realise it was outmatched in the field of battle. Humanitarian assistance that was being organised for these civilians through the Government with assistance from various organisations, including the World Food Programme, the ICRC and other international agencies, was also blatantly appropriated by the LTTE. This forced migration of civilians posed a significant obstacle to our humanitarian operations.
The Sri Lankan military responded by taking the utmost care in all its offensives. Small group warfare was extensively employed, even though it meant placing our troops at greater risk of harm by the enemy. A great deal of effort was put into intelligence gathering through the penetration of Special Forces into enemy territory and the comprehensive use of technology. The establishment of No Fire Zones and Safe Corridors gave civilians an opportunity to escape into areas that had already been cleared. Of course, the LTTE did its best to prevent their escape by shooting at them whenever they attempted to flee. The LTTE also established their artillery positions at places such as hospitals and within civilian encampments in order to limit the Army's ability to retaliate. As a result, especially towards the end of the campaign, the use of heavy weaponry was significantly curtailed and then stopped outright.
The extensive use of technology by all of the Sri Lankan Armed Forces during their operations did a great deal to minimise civilian losses. Footage from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles was studied to enable the acquisition of legitimate enemy targets, which were destroyed using precision-guided munitions. Air Force pilots were specially trained to identify and target enemy positions with great accuracy. The minimum amount of necessary force was always used in munitions to ensure that the damage dealt was localised so that minimal harm would come to civilians and civilian property in the vicinity. Through these measures, the Sri Lankan Armed Services ensured that collateral damage was kept to an absolute minimum during the course of the entire campaign.
Above and beyond containing incidental harm to civilians, the military also did a lot to try and ensure that humanitarian aid was reaching the civilians trapped in the LTTE's clutches. The Navy protected Sea Lines of Communication to facilitate delivery of humanitarian assistance to trapped civilians. It also protected safe corridors along the coast for escapees to cross through to Government controlled areas.
The Air Force airlifted humanitarian aid to civilians, and provided emergency evacuation to civilians who managed to escape LTTE imprisonment at great risk to their lives. These escapees were very often shot at, and those who managed to cross over to cleared areas were quite often in need of medical assistance. By providing such emergency assistance in all possible instances, the Armed Forces did a great deal to safeguard the lives of liberated civilians.
The civilians who crossed over to Government territory by escaping the LTTE and those who were rescued after the defeat of the LTTE in any particular area, were welcomed at reception centres and welfare camps established at various sites across the battlefront. This process was continually monitored by the ICRC. Transit camps were established during which the civilians were sorted according to their places of origin. They were then transported to larger facilities that had been organised accordingly.
In all these camps, the liberated civilians were given medical assistance, food, clothing, shelter and all other basic requirements under the supervision of the UN organisations. Help was also provided by various other agencies and foreign Governments in dealing with this situation. A great deal of effort was also taken to help these innocent victims of LTTE brutality to live with dignity despite the ordeal they had suffered. They were provided educational, vocational, recreational and entertainment facilities, while stringent security was also maintained to ensure that LTTE infiltrators and saboteurs did not have an opportunity to create more harm.
With the conclusion of the military campaign, the fact that over two hundred thousand people remained in welfare camps and IDP centres was given a lot of attention by the international media. It was claimed that the people lived in terrible conditions within these camps and that the Government was not paying any attention to their immediate resettlement.
These accusations were spurred by the LTTE's propaganda machine, which mostly exists outside Sri Lanka and continues to function to this day. The LTTE apologists also had a lot of anger at the Government for the LTTE's demise, and even when they were not wholly behind the accusations, they added a lot of fuel to them. What these allegations missed, however, was the fact that the Government, together with assisting international agencies and foreign governments, was doing its best to cope with a massive humanitarian disaster caused by the LTTE.
The civilians could not be resettled immediately as the LTTE had strewn the villages and towns that they were forced out of with thousands of landmines and booby-traps. Clearing and de-mining those areas to make them safe was absolutely essential before enabling the return of the internally displaced. The infrastructure that had been destroyed also needed to be rebuilt swiftly. In the meantime, the Government did its best to ensure that the people remaining in the centres were well looked after.
By marshalling its resources, including the Armed Forces, very swiftly and with the help of friendly nations that provided assistance, the demining process and infrastructure development process were greatly expedited, and most of the work has already been carried out. I am happy to note that of all the internally displaced people the Government had to look after at welfare camps, nearly 215,000 were resettled within one year.
In addition to the internally displaced civilians, more than eleven thousand LTTE cadres surrendered or were detained by the military during the course of its operations. These detainees have been processed and sorted according to their level of involvement in the LTTE's activities. Over four thousand junior cadres are still undergoing extensive rehabilitation programmes. 595 former child soldiers were rehabilitated with the help of UNICEF and reintegrated to society, while 6130 adult cadres have also been trained and reintegrated.
These rehabilitation programmes included educational as well as vocational training, so that the rehabilitated former cadres will have no difficulty in readjusting to normal life and reintegrating into society. I am happy to note that several former child soldiers have successfully sat for their Advanced Level examinations and a few have even qualified to attend medical school. Of course, cadres who were more closely involved in the LTTE's numerous atrocities will be prosecuted through the normal legal system.
In addition to the resettlement, rehabilitation and redevelopment activities that were carried out in the aftermath of the conflict, the Government has paid special attention to the restoration of normalcy through the revival of socio-political institutions in the cleared areas. Normalcy was restored very early on to the East, where former armed group members were encouraged to enter the political mainstream and work for the people through legal channels. Tamil speaking policemen were recruited, and the role played by the military in the upholding of law and order was significantly curtailed.
Similar progress is rapidly being made in the North, where free and fair elections were held for the first time in decades. At the same time, reconstruction activities continue unabated. The military has been heavily involved in these activities, building houses, laying roads, establishing medical clinics and helping people resettle. By winning the hearts and minds of the people long brutalised by LTTE, the armed forces will help heal the wounds of the past and help restore normalcy to a long suffering section of our society.
The defeat of terrorism in Sri Lanka is a unique event in history. During the course of this address, I have touched upon the overall framework within which this success was achieved, and pointed towards the progress that has been made since. Over the course of the remaining sessions, you will have an opportunity to learn about the Sri Lankan Experience in much greater detail.
Terrorism is an international threat, and no country should suffer from it as Sri Lanka has suffered. On behalf of the Government of Sri Lanka, I wish to express our sincere hope that you will be able to use the lessons learnt at this seminar to defeat international terrorism and bring safety to the world. For the moment, let me conclude by wishing all of you a productive and enjoyable stay in Sri Lanka.
Thank you.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
http://www.defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20110531_01
Seminar on "Defeating Terrorism - Sri Lankan Experience" begins today
The Seminar on "Defeting Terrorism - Sri Lankan Experience" started short while ago, with representation of 45 countries at Hotel Galadari, Colombo.
The Secretary to the Ministry of Defence is scheduled to deliver the key note address at the event.
Ground Commanders who fought the battle against LTTE terrorists rescuing over 300000 civilians from the clutches of the LTTE are expected to share their own experiences at the conference.
Moreover, Prof G L Peiris Minister of External Affairs, Hon. Mahinda Samarasinghe Minister of Plantation, Mr. Lalith Weeratunga Secretary to H.E the President of Sri Lanka, Mr. Ajith Nivard Cabraal, Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, Dr. Rohan Guneratne Head of the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)] at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, Dr. Ahmed S.Hashim and Dr. David Kilcullen will also deliver presentations at the conference.
The conference will be continued till 02nd June 2011
Seminar on "Defeating Terrorism - Sri Lankan Experience" begins today
The Seminar on "Defeting Terrorism - Sri Lankan Experience" started short while ago, with representation of 45 countries at Hotel Galadari, Colombo.
The Secretary to the Ministry of Defence is scheduled to deliver the key note address at the event.
Ground Commanders who fought the battle against LTTE terrorists rescuing over 300000 civilians from the clutches of the LTTE are expected to share their own experiences at the conference.
Moreover, Prof G L Peiris Minister of External Affairs, Hon. Mahinda Samarasinghe Minister of Plantation, Mr. Lalith Weeratunga Secretary to H.E the President of Sri Lanka, Mr. Ajith Nivard Cabraal, Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, Dr. Rohan Guneratne Head of the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research (ICPVTR)] at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, Dr. Ahmed S.Hashim and Dr. David Kilcullen will also deliver presentations at the conference.
The conference will be continued till 02nd June 2011
Desist from arriving at hasty conclusions-Sri Lanka tells HRC
http://www.defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20110531_03
Desist from arriving at hasty conclusions-Sri Lanka tells HRC
Reconciliation, a government's priority
95% of IDPs resettled
Over 50% of ex- combatants rehabilitated
Implementing comprehensive development plan in NE
Sri Lanka told the international delegates at Human Right Council to desist from arriving at hasty conclusions and afford time, space and opportunity to complete its own process of reconciliation.
Addressing the 17th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva on Monday, Plantation Minister and Special Human Rights Envoy Mahinda Samarasinghe said the process of reconciliation is a priority for the Sri Lankan government and need to be sustained and gradually built upon.
The Minister apprised the HRC of the measures taken by the Sri Lankan government to address the issues affecting the lives of the displaced during the war.
Out of the 290,000 displaced people at the end of the war two years ago, 95 percent have been resettled now and the remainder will be resettled once the demining process is completed. A large number of houses have been constructed and distributed to the resettled families, the Minister said.
Commenting on the ex-combatants, the Minister said out of the 11,644 ex-LTTE cadres surrendered or arrested at the end of the war, 6,500 had been rehabilitated and reintegrated in to the society.
"The Government is in the process of working towards the release of all remaining ex-combatants undergoing the rehabilitation on a staggered basis commensurate with their culpability with terrorist activities," Minister Samarasinghe added.
The Government is implementing a comprehensive development program targeting Northern and Eastern Provinces enabling their rapid rehabilitation and reintegration to the national economy, he further informed.
Informing the Council that the government is engaged in discussions with the Tamil political parties to resolve the issues, the Minister said "healing the wounds of recent past is important to sustain the reconciliation."
Reminding the Council that the home-grown domestic process of reconciliation, the Lesson Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) commenced its work in August 2010 and yet to complete one year while similar processes elsewhere have taken longer, the Minister slated the critiques of the process.
"In this context, it is disheartening to note the haste with which some have sought to usurp the Sri Lankan government's prerogative in deciding its domestic process," the Minister criticized.
"We firmly believe that our home-grown process is capable of addressing the nuances of the unique situation," the Minister said pointing out that there is no one international panacea that can be applied to the Sri Lanka's complex situation.
Reminding the Council that Sri Lanka established the domestic process before the UN Secretary-General appointed his Panel of Experts to investigate Sri Lanka's accountability during the later stage of the war, Minister Samarasinghe flayed the report as 'manifestly flawed'.
He said "Sri Lanka regrets the procedural and substantive anomalies in the manifestly flawed report ostensibly compiled as an advisory document to the highest office in the UN, invoking a procedure outside the established intergovernmental process."
The Minister further noted that in an unusual turn of events the report was made public simultaneously with a statement saying that the report was being carefully reviewed.
Recommending to the Council to discourage this kind of irregular practice as it might lead to circumvent established procedures, the Minister said the Panel has acted outside its jurisdiction in excess of its mandate.
He slammed the comments made by the office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights saying that the statements made by the Commissioner lacked objectivity and contained prejudgment of the domestic mechanism established by the Sri Lankan government even before it has commenced its work.
He recalled that in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attack in the United States, the UN resolution 1368 and 1373 established the right for a sovereign and its people to defend against terrorists and said Sri Lanka conducted the humanitarian operation exercising that right.
He said the recent characterization of Sri Lanka's humanitarian operation by the HR High Commissioner as one which was conducted "under the guise of fighting terrorism" is most unfortunate.
"Such a characterization is fully misplaced as the community of nations was well aware that Sri Lanka was combatting one of the most ruthless terrorist organizations in the world," Minister Samarasinghe said.
Minister Samarasinghe, referring to the number of civilian casualties mentioned in the statements made by the UNHCR office said, use of unverified information in the statements is totally unwarranted and it gives rise to serious concerns as to whether the Sri Lankan situation is being considered in an objective manner.
"Having regard to the vicissitudes of manner in which Sri Lanka has been treated we seek the equal protection of the UN system," the Minister concluded.
Full text of the speech;
Mr. President
Excellencies
Madam High Commissioner
Distinguished delegates
I wish to commend the constructive manner in which you, Mr President, have been conducting the work of the Human Rights Council. Our deliberations have been guided by you with sagacity and sensitivity, aimed at achieving the objectives of our agenda in a fair and equitable manner. You have the fullest cooperation and support of my delegation for the work of the Council.
Mr. President,
Consequent to the liberation of our people from the clutches of terrorism in May 2009, and mindful of the insurmountable challenges faced in its aftermath the Government of President Rajapaksa has embarked upon several initiatives in the areas of resettlement, rehabilitation, economic development, reconstruction and reconciliation to benefit those whose lives were affected by 30 years of conflict. In the immediate aftermath, the Government's priority has been the resettlement of the approximately 290,000 IDPs, while ensuring that they are provided adequate shelter, food, security and livelihood support. Today, ninety five percent (95%) have been resettled. It is envisaged to resettle the remainder, once the demining process is completed.
In addition to catering to the needs of the IDPs, considerable action has been taken by the government to facilitate the restoration of normalcy in the lives of the returning IDPs. To support the returnees in their original areas of habitation, a large number of houses have been constructed in the former theatre of conflict and distributed among the resettling IDP families.
With regard to rehabilitation, former child combatants have been rehabilitated and have been beneficiaries of educational programmes including vocational training. Of the 11,644 ex-combatants who surrendered or were arrested at the end of the conflict, 6,530 have already been rehabilitated and reintegrated into society. There is even a large number who have qualified for admission to universities in the country. The Government is in the process of working towards the release of all remaining ex-combatants undergoing rehabilitation on a staggered basis, commensurate with their culpability with terrorist activity.
Mr. President,
Considering that large parts of Sri Lanka's Northern and Eastern Provinces were denied infrastructure development by the unlawful presence and activities of the terrorists, the Government is implementing a comprehensive development programme, targeting these two Provinces in particular, to enable their rapid reintegration and contribution to the national economy.
Mr. President,
The process of reconciliation is priority for the Government as it has everything to do with the people, who have now begun to enjoy the dividends of peace. This process needs to be sustained and gradually built upon. In addition to the comprehensive programme of socio economic development in the former theatre of conflict, the Government has commenced discussions with Tamil political parties examining constitutional, legal, and democratic reform. The Government has also extended an invitation to the Tamil diaspora to harness resources and talent for the betterment of Sri Lanka, especially in the Northern and Eastern provinces. We believe that of the challenges we face in the post-conflict phase healing the wounds of the recent past is important to sustained reconciliation.
It is to address this challenge, Mr President, that the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) was established in May 2010 by His Excellency the President founded upon the principle of restorative justice, and focusing on identification of those responsible for past events related to the conflict: Its work commenced 3 months later.
It is important to remember that this domestic process was established and commenced work prior to the establishment of the advisory Panel of the UN Secretary General. You will, no doubt, appreciate, that the process of reconciliation must also involve truth, justice and reparation. The LLRC is proceeding in this direction as it has been engaging in hearing the experience of affected persons, listening to their stories, examining them to elicit the truth and draw possible investigative material to enable further follow-up action.
Despite the repetitive clarion calls for accountability, we have taken on the responsibility to examine the conflict which lasted nearly three decades, in a holistic manner, with a view to prescribing remedial action that will prevent any further violence in our country. Having commenced its substantive work in August 2010, this domestic process has yet to complete one year, and similar processes elsewhere, as you very well know, have taken far longer. In this context it is disconcerting to note the haste with which some have sought to usurp the Government of Sri Lanka's prerogative in deciding its domestic process. Undoubtedly, there is no one international panacea that can be applied to such a complex set of domestic issues. We firmly believe that our home-grown process is capable of addressing the nuances of our unique situation. The LLRC which was earlier scheduled to conclude its work this month, has sought and received an extension of its tenure by 6 months, to examine further relevant testimony and information which have come to light. We urge those critics, through you Mr President, to desist from arriving at hasty conclusions, and afford Sri Lanka the time, space and opportunity it needs to complete our domestic process.
Pursuant to the interim recommendations of the (LLRC) in September 2010, the Inter Agency Advisory Committee (IAAC) was established to facilitate the expeditious implementation of LLRC recommendations.
These included matters related to the detention of ex-combatants, land, law and order, administration, language, socio-economic and livelihood issues. The IAAC has facilitated the establishment of a speedy mechanism to which the LLRC can channel the complaints received with a possibility of immediate investigation and remedial action. The Attorney General in this regard, is empowered to institute criminal proceedings based on the material collected during the course of the sittings of the LLRC. It is with great satisfaction that we note the expeditious implementation of the recommendations made by the LLRC.
Mr. President,
Some of the recommendations already implemented include the reduction of High Security Zones, the closure of the Omanthai detention centre, the release of a large number of ex-combatants, the resolution of land disputes and the swift steps taken to ensure that no groups carry firearms with a deadline for the surrender of illegal weapons.
Mr. President,
As I informed this august body in March, Sri Lanka's steadfast commitment to the further promotion and protection of human rights is enshrined in the proposed National Action Plan for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights. This action plan was developed through a consultative, participatory process which included the participation of civil society actors on an equal footing with government. I am pleased to announce that this Action Plan has now been submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers for their consideration.
With the adoption of the 18th amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka in September 2010, work has commenced to establish the independent Commissions. Among these are the Permanent Commission to investigate allegations of bribery and corruption, the Public Service Commission and the Finance Commission. As I informed this Council in March 2011, the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka has been re-established and is now fully functional. The Human Rights Commission has, in fact, just taken proactive steps to inquire into allegations of rights violations of persons affected by the conflict, including the displaced.
Mr. President,
I believe it is appropriate to share our perspective on the UN system, considering that Sri Lanka has been an active member of the World Body. Sri Lanka takes seriously its rights, obligations and duties and accords great importance to its engagement with the United Nations system and especially with this august body. It is in this spirit of constructive engagement that we have periodically kept the Member States, Observers and the High Commissioner for Human Rights briefed throughout on the conflict and post conflict developments and measures put in place to promote and protect human rights in Sri Lanka. In addition, we submitted ourselves to the UPR and have been actively participating in the examination of Sri Lanka's reports to treaty bodies in keeping with its obligations. Further, UN personnel and the international community directly participated in such bodies as the Consultative Committee for Humanitarian Affairs. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with the Council, the High Commissioner and all special procedures and mechanisms in a spirit of mutual respect, openness and constructive cooperation.
Mr. President,
It may be recalled that I informed the council of the domestic process that the government of Sri Lanka has put into place to move towards reconciliation. Despite the fact that this domestic process had commenced its work, a decision was taken to appoint a panel of experts solely for the purpose of advising the UNSG.
Sri Lanka however, regrets the procedural and substantive anomalies in the manifestly flawed report ostensibly compiled as an advisory document to the highest office of the UN, invoking a procedure outside the established intergovernmental process. Consequently in an unusual turn of events the report was made public simultaneously with a statement being issued that the report was being carefully reviewed.
Mr. President,
I would strongly commend to this Council that this kind of irregular practice be discouraged as this might well lead to established procedure being circumvented arbitrarily. It is also regrettable that the Panel has acted outside its jurisdiction in excess of its mandate.
Moreover, Mr President, statements attributable to the Office of the High Commissioner having worryingly given rise to misgivings as to a lack of objectivity and contain prejudgement of the domestic mechanism established by the Government, even before it has concluded its work. It is undeniable that the humanitarian operations in Sri Lanka resulted in the rescue of over 290,000 persons - innocent civilians - held hostage by a terrorist organization proscribed in over 30 countries. It is well to remember that in the wake of the September 11th tragedy the UN invoked the right of self-defence and called upon the international community to neutralise or combat such terrorism by non-state actors by its resolutions 1368 and 1373 of September 2001. The humanitarian operation was therefore a part of an act of the sovereign and its people in the wake of terrorist aggression. It is equally undeniable that Sri Lanka has taken definite steps at great cost to resettle and rebuild the lives of the people in the conflict-affected area. Finally, it is readily apparent to all that the military capability of the terrorists to launch any offensive against the people and Government of Sri Lanka has been completely degraded. Therefore, the recent characterization by the HCHR of the very nature of the operation as one which was conducted "under the guise of fighting terrorism", is most unfortunate. Such a characterization is wholly misplaced, as the community of nations was well aware that Sri Lanka was combating one of the most ruthless terrorist organisations in the world. These statements also concluded that the conflict cost the lives of tens of thousands of civilians - the basis for such a statistical assumption not being revealed. Unverified information being used in this manner is totally unwarranted and gives rise to serious concerns as to whether the Sri Lankan situation is being considered in an objective manner. Mr. President, having regard to the vicissitudes of the manner in which Sri Lanka has been treated we seek the equal protection of the UN system in our engagement.
Mr. President,
It is of paramount importance that high offices of the UN System are scrupulously impartial, independent and transparent, and are seen to be so. Any perceived lack of these fundamental characteristics would affect the effectiveness of such critical institutions. The work of the Special Procedure mandate holders and working groups being facilitated by the OHCHR, could also be seen to be compromised by such perceived shortcomings. It is also of concern to Sri Lanka that, while there has been robust engagement with the intergovernmental processes of the United Nations, any move to undermine it through attempts to formalise initiatives which arose outside intergovernmental processes, will entrench patently flawed procedure. We have every confidence that such unusual procedures will not find accommodation within this Council.
Mr. President,
In conclusion, Sri Lanka looks forward to continuing its constructive dialogue in the spirit of respect, cooperation and reciprocity with the HRC in particular, the UN system in general and its other international partners.
Thank you.
Desist from arriving at hasty conclusions-Sri Lanka tells HRC
Reconciliation, a government's priority
95% of IDPs resettled
Over 50% of ex- combatants rehabilitated
Implementing comprehensive development plan in NE
Sri Lanka told the international delegates at Human Right Council to desist from arriving at hasty conclusions and afford time, space and opportunity to complete its own process of reconciliation.
Addressing the 17th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva on Monday, Plantation Minister and Special Human Rights Envoy Mahinda Samarasinghe said the process of reconciliation is a priority for the Sri Lankan government and need to be sustained and gradually built upon.
The Minister apprised the HRC of the measures taken by the Sri Lankan government to address the issues affecting the lives of the displaced during the war.
Out of the 290,000 displaced people at the end of the war two years ago, 95 percent have been resettled now and the remainder will be resettled once the demining process is completed. A large number of houses have been constructed and distributed to the resettled families, the Minister said.
Commenting on the ex-combatants, the Minister said out of the 11,644 ex-LTTE cadres surrendered or arrested at the end of the war, 6,500 had been rehabilitated and reintegrated in to the society.
"The Government is in the process of working towards the release of all remaining ex-combatants undergoing the rehabilitation on a staggered basis commensurate with their culpability with terrorist activities," Minister Samarasinghe added.
The Government is implementing a comprehensive development program targeting Northern and Eastern Provinces enabling their rapid rehabilitation and reintegration to the national economy, he further informed.
Informing the Council that the government is engaged in discussions with the Tamil political parties to resolve the issues, the Minister said "healing the wounds of recent past is important to sustain the reconciliation."
Reminding the Council that the home-grown domestic process of reconciliation, the Lesson Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) commenced its work in August 2010 and yet to complete one year while similar processes elsewhere have taken longer, the Minister slated the critiques of the process.
"In this context, it is disheartening to note the haste with which some have sought to usurp the Sri Lankan government's prerogative in deciding its domestic process," the Minister criticized.
"We firmly believe that our home-grown process is capable of addressing the nuances of the unique situation," the Minister said pointing out that there is no one international panacea that can be applied to the Sri Lanka's complex situation.
Reminding the Council that Sri Lanka established the domestic process before the UN Secretary-General appointed his Panel of Experts to investigate Sri Lanka's accountability during the later stage of the war, Minister Samarasinghe flayed the report as 'manifestly flawed'.
He said "Sri Lanka regrets the procedural and substantive anomalies in the manifestly flawed report ostensibly compiled as an advisory document to the highest office in the UN, invoking a procedure outside the established intergovernmental process."
The Minister further noted that in an unusual turn of events the report was made public simultaneously with a statement saying that the report was being carefully reviewed.
Recommending to the Council to discourage this kind of irregular practice as it might lead to circumvent established procedures, the Minister said the Panel has acted outside its jurisdiction in excess of its mandate.
He slammed the comments made by the office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights saying that the statements made by the Commissioner lacked objectivity and contained prejudgment of the domestic mechanism established by the Sri Lankan government even before it has commenced its work.
He recalled that in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attack in the United States, the UN resolution 1368 and 1373 established the right for a sovereign and its people to defend against terrorists and said Sri Lanka conducted the humanitarian operation exercising that right.
He said the recent characterization of Sri Lanka's humanitarian operation by the HR High Commissioner as one which was conducted "under the guise of fighting terrorism" is most unfortunate.
"Such a characterization is fully misplaced as the community of nations was well aware that Sri Lanka was combatting one of the most ruthless terrorist organizations in the world," Minister Samarasinghe said.
Minister Samarasinghe, referring to the number of civilian casualties mentioned in the statements made by the UNHCR office said, use of unverified information in the statements is totally unwarranted and it gives rise to serious concerns as to whether the Sri Lankan situation is being considered in an objective manner.
"Having regard to the vicissitudes of manner in which Sri Lanka has been treated we seek the equal protection of the UN system," the Minister concluded.
Full text of the speech;
Mr. President
Excellencies
Madam High Commissioner
Distinguished delegates
I wish to commend the constructive manner in which you, Mr President, have been conducting the work of the Human Rights Council. Our deliberations have been guided by you with sagacity and sensitivity, aimed at achieving the objectives of our agenda in a fair and equitable manner. You have the fullest cooperation and support of my delegation for the work of the Council.
Mr. President,
Consequent to the liberation of our people from the clutches of terrorism in May 2009, and mindful of the insurmountable challenges faced in its aftermath the Government of President Rajapaksa has embarked upon several initiatives in the areas of resettlement, rehabilitation, economic development, reconstruction and reconciliation to benefit those whose lives were affected by 30 years of conflict. In the immediate aftermath, the Government's priority has been the resettlement of the approximately 290,000 IDPs, while ensuring that they are provided adequate shelter, food, security and livelihood support. Today, ninety five percent (95%) have been resettled. It is envisaged to resettle the remainder, once the demining process is completed.
In addition to catering to the needs of the IDPs, considerable action has been taken by the government to facilitate the restoration of normalcy in the lives of the returning IDPs. To support the returnees in their original areas of habitation, a large number of houses have been constructed in the former theatre of conflict and distributed among the resettling IDP families.
With regard to rehabilitation, former child combatants have been rehabilitated and have been beneficiaries of educational programmes including vocational training. Of the 11,644 ex-combatants who surrendered or were arrested at the end of the conflict, 6,530 have already been rehabilitated and reintegrated into society. There is even a large number who have qualified for admission to universities in the country. The Government is in the process of working towards the release of all remaining ex-combatants undergoing rehabilitation on a staggered basis, commensurate with their culpability with terrorist activity.
Mr. President,
Considering that large parts of Sri Lanka's Northern and Eastern Provinces were denied infrastructure development by the unlawful presence and activities of the terrorists, the Government is implementing a comprehensive development programme, targeting these two Provinces in particular, to enable their rapid reintegration and contribution to the national economy.
Mr. President,
The process of reconciliation is priority for the Government as it has everything to do with the people, who have now begun to enjoy the dividends of peace. This process needs to be sustained and gradually built upon. In addition to the comprehensive programme of socio economic development in the former theatre of conflict, the Government has commenced discussions with Tamil political parties examining constitutional, legal, and democratic reform. The Government has also extended an invitation to the Tamil diaspora to harness resources and talent for the betterment of Sri Lanka, especially in the Northern and Eastern provinces. We believe that of the challenges we face in the post-conflict phase healing the wounds of the recent past is important to sustained reconciliation.
It is to address this challenge, Mr President, that the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) was established in May 2010 by His Excellency the President founded upon the principle of restorative justice, and focusing on identification of those responsible for past events related to the conflict: Its work commenced 3 months later.
It is important to remember that this domestic process was established and commenced work prior to the establishment of the advisory Panel of the UN Secretary General. You will, no doubt, appreciate, that the process of reconciliation must also involve truth, justice and reparation. The LLRC is proceeding in this direction as it has been engaging in hearing the experience of affected persons, listening to their stories, examining them to elicit the truth and draw possible investigative material to enable further follow-up action.
Despite the repetitive clarion calls for accountability, we have taken on the responsibility to examine the conflict which lasted nearly three decades, in a holistic manner, with a view to prescribing remedial action that will prevent any further violence in our country. Having commenced its substantive work in August 2010, this domestic process has yet to complete one year, and similar processes elsewhere, as you very well know, have taken far longer. In this context it is disconcerting to note the haste with which some have sought to usurp the Government of Sri Lanka's prerogative in deciding its domestic process. Undoubtedly, there is no one international panacea that can be applied to such a complex set of domestic issues. We firmly believe that our home-grown process is capable of addressing the nuances of our unique situation. The LLRC which was earlier scheduled to conclude its work this month, has sought and received an extension of its tenure by 6 months, to examine further relevant testimony and information which have come to light. We urge those critics, through you Mr President, to desist from arriving at hasty conclusions, and afford Sri Lanka the time, space and opportunity it needs to complete our domestic process.
Pursuant to the interim recommendations of the (LLRC) in September 2010, the Inter Agency Advisory Committee (IAAC) was established to facilitate the expeditious implementation of LLRC recommendations.
These included matters related to the detention of ex-combatants, land, law and order, administration, language, socio-economic and livelihood issues. The IAAC has facilitated the establishment of a speedy mechanism to which the LLRC can channel the complaints received with a possibility of immediate investigation and remedial action. The Attorney General in this regard, is empowered to institute criminal proceedings based on the material collected during the course of the sittings of the LLRC. It is with great satisfaction that we note the expeditious implementation of the recommendations made by the LLRC.
Mr. President,
Some of the recommendations already implemented include the reduction of High Security Zones, the closure of the Omanthai detention centre, the release of a large number of ex-combatants, the resolution of land disputes and the swift steps taken to ensure that no groups carry firearms with a deadline for the surrender of illegal weapons.
Mr. President,
As I informed this august body in March, Sri Lanka's steadfast commitment to the further promotion and protection of human rights is enshrined in the proposed National Action Plan for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights. This action plan was developed through a consultative, participatory process which included the participation of civil society actors on an equal footing with government. I am pleased to announce that this Action Plan has now been submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers for their consideration.
With the adoption of the 18th amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka in September 2010, work has commenced to establish the independent Commissions. Among these are the Permanent Commission to investigate allegations of bribery and corruption, the Public Service Commission and the Finance Commission. As I informed this Council in March 2011, the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka has been re-established and is now fully functional. The Human Rights Commission has, in fact, just taken proactive steps to inquire into allegations of rights violations of persons affected by the conflict, including the displaced.
Mr. President,
I believe it is appropriate to share our perspective on the UN system, considering that Sri Lanka has been an active member of the World Body. Sri Lanka takes seriously its rights, obligations and duties and accords great importance to its engagement with the United Nations system and especially with this august body. It is in this spirit of constructive engagement that we have periodically kept the Member States, Observers and the High Commissioner for Human Rights briefed throughout on the conflict and post conflict developments and measures put in place to promote and protect human rights in Sri Lanka. In addition, we submitted ourselves to the UPR and have been actively participating in the examination of Sri Lanka's reports to treaty bodies in keeping with its obligations. Further, UN personnel and the international community directly participated in such bodies as the Consultative Committee for Humanitarian Affairs. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with the Council, the High Commissioner and all special procedures and mechanisms in a spirit of mutual respect, openness and constructive cooperation.
Mr. President,
It may be recalled that I informed the council of the domestic process that the government of Sri Lanka has put into place to move towards reconciliation. Despite the fact that this domestic process had commenced its work, a decision was taken to appoint a panel of experts solely for the purpose of advising the UNSG.
Sri Lanka however, regrets the procedural and substantive anomalies in the manifestly flawed report ostensibly compiled as an advisory document to the highest office of the UN, invoking a procedure outside the established intergovernmental process. Consequently in an unusual turn of events the report was made public simultaneously with a statement being issued that the report was being carefully reviewed.
Mr. President,
I would strongly commend to this Council that this kind of irregular practice be discouraged as this might well lead to established procedure being circumvented arbitrarily. It is also regrettable that the Panel has acted outside its jurisdiction in excess of its mandate.
Moreover, Mr President, statements attributable to the Office of the High Commissioner having worryingly given rise to misgivings as to a lack of objectivity and contain prejudgement of the domestic mechanism established by the Government, even before it has concluded its work. It is undeniable that the humanitarian operations in Sri Lanka resulted in the rescue of over 290,000 persons - innocent civilians - held hostage by a terrorist organization proscribed in over 30 countries. It is well to remember that in the wake of the September 11th tragedy the UN invoked the right of self-defence and called upon the international community to neutralise or combat such terrorism by non-state actors by its resolutions 1368 and 1373 of September 2001. The humanitarian operation was therefore a part of an act of the sovereign and its people in the wake of terrorist aggression. It is equally undeniable that Sri Lanka has taken definite steps at great cost to resettle and rebuild the lives of the people in the conflict-affected area. Finally, it is readily apparent to all that the military capability of the terrorists to launch any offensive against the people and Government of Sri Lanka has been completely degraded. Therefore, the recent characterization by the HCHR of the very nature of the operation as one which was conducted "under the guise of fighting terrorism", is most unfortunate. Such a characterization is wholly misplaced, as the community of nations was well aware that Sri Lanka was combating one of the most ruthless terrorist organisations in the world. These statements also concluded that the conflict cost the lives of tens of thousands of civilians - the basis for such a statistical assumption not being revealed. Unverified information being used in this manner is totally unwarranted and gives rise to serious concerns as to whether the Sri Lankan situation is being considered in an objective manner. Mr. President, having regard to the vicissitudes of the manner in which Sri Lanka has been treated we seek the equal protection of the UN system in our engagement.
Mr. President,
It is of paramount importance that high offices of the UN System are scrupulously impartial, independent and transparent, and are seen to be so. Any perceived lack of these fundamental characteristics would affect the effectiveness of such critical institutions. The work of the Special Procedure mandate holders and working groups being facilitated by the OHCHR, could also be seen to be compromised by such perceived shortcomings. It is also of concern to Sri Lanka that, while there has been robust engagement with the intergovernmental processes of the United Nations, any move to undermine it through attempts to formalise initiatives which arose outside intergovernmental processes, will entrench patently flawed procedure. We have every confidence that such unusual procedures will not find accommodation within this Council.
Mr. President,
In conclusion, Sri Lanka looks forward to continuing its constructive dialogue in the spirit of respect, cooperation and reciprocity with the HRC in particular, the UN system in general and its other international partners.
Thank you.
http://www.defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20110531_02
Canada deports Tamil migrant over LTTE terrorist affiliation
The Immigration and Refugee Board on Monday (May 30), ordered the deportation of another Tamil migrant from the MV Sun Sea, after finding that his activities in Sri Lanka - including an appearance in a Tamil Tiger propaganda video - constituted membership in a terrorist organization.
This is the fourth migrant from the Sun Sea to be ordered deported on such grounds since the ship carrying almost 500 asylum-seekers arrived on the West Coast last August.
In a written decision, IRB adjudicator Geoff Rempel acknowledged that the migrant was never a formal member of the banned Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and never participated directly in the group's armed struggle.
However, Rempel found that the man was "more than a mere sympathizer and that his contributions to the LTTE were much more than minimal or marginal."
He cited the man's participation in a fictional movie portraying an attack on Sri Lankan army forces. The movie also showed LTTE fighters training and engaging in hand-to-hand combat.
The migrant's lawyer, Shepherd Moss, had argued that the movie could have been mere entertainment, perhaps even a spoof.
Rempel disagreed.
"I have been presented with no evidence that the movie was made to generate box office profits, unlike the Hollywood films of John Wayne and Tom Cruise," he wrote. "I accept the minister (of public safety's) view that the movie was LTTE propaganda, made to support their war aims."
The LTTE engaged in a lengthy struggle for independence against the Sri Lankan forces. The civil war ended in 2009 with the Tigers' defeat.
In his decision, Rempel found that the man's work as a karate instructor provided further support to the LTTE's war effort.
"His high-profile involvement with the LTTE went far beyond the civilian-LTTE interactions that may have been unavoidable in LTTE-controlled territories," Rempel concluded.
The migrant, who is not currently in custody, did not show any emotion when informed of the decision Monday.
Anyone who is ordered deported has options to appeal, including applying to the Federal Court for a judicial review of the decision, said IRB spokeswoman Melissa Anderson.
A publication ban prevents the media from identifying the migrant.
The IRB adjudicator redacted portions of his written decision because he felt that some details might serve to identify the migrant.
Fifteen migrants from the Sun Sea remain in detention.
Courtesy: Montrealgazette
Canada deports Tamil migrant over LTTE terrorist affiliation
The Immigration and Refugee Board on Monday (May 30), ordered the deportation of another Tamil migrant from the MV Sun Sea, after finding that his activities in Sri Lanka - including an appearance in a Tamil Tiger propaganda video - constituted membership in a terrorist organization.
This is the fourth migrant from the Sun Sea to be ordered deported on such grounds since the ship carrying almost 500 asylum-seekers arrived on the West Coast last August.
In a written decision, IRB adjudicator Geoff Rempel acknowledged that the migrant was never a formal member of the banned Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and never participated directly in the group's armed struggle.
However, Rempel found that the man was "more than a mere sympathizer and that his contributions to the LTTE were much more than minimal or marginal."
He cited the man's participation in a fictional movie portraying an attack on Sri Lankan army forces. The movie also showed LTTE fighters training and engaging in hand-to-hand combat.
The migrant's lawyer, Shepherd Moss, had argued that the movie could have been mere entertainment, perhaps even a spoof.
Rempel disagreed.
"I have been presented with no evidence that the movie was made to generate box office profits, unlike the Hollywood films of John Wayne and Tom Cruise," he wrote. "I accept the minister (of public safety's) view that the movie was LTTE propaganda, made to support their war aims."
The LTTE engaged in a lengthy struggle for independence against the Sri Lankan forces. The civil war ended in 2009 with the Tigers' defeat.
In his decision, Rempel found that the man's work as a karate instructor provided further support to the LTTE's war effort.
"His high-profile involvement with the LTTE went far beyond the civilian-LTTE interactions that may have been unavoidable in LTTE-controlled territories," Rempel concluded.
The migrant, who is not currently in custody, did not show any emotion when informed of the decision Monday.
Anyone who is ordered deported has options to appeal, including applying to the Federal Court for a judicial review of the decision, said IRB spokeswoman Melissa Anderson.
A publication ban prevents the media from identifying the migrant.
The IRB adjudicator redacted portions of his written decision because he felt that some details might serve to identify the migrant.
Fifteen migrants from the Sun Sea remain in detention.
Courtesy: Montrealgazette
http://www.defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20110530_02
Mihindu Seth Medura declared open for War Heroes
www.defence.lk">H.E President and C-in-C Mahinda Rajapaksa Monday (May 30) declared open the 'Mihindu Seth Medura'- a healing home for war heroes at Aththidiya in Dehiwala.
The project is the brainchild of the Secretary Defence Mr. Gotabaya Rajapaksa- which has made history as the first such facility to be built in South Asia. "It is our priority to look into the needs of those who have given everything for the country and in return never expected any. What we do as welfare projects may seem to be technically termed as CSR in the corporate world, but this work undertaken by the Ministry of Defence and the Security Forces is much more than an extension of responsibility. It is a sacred duty by the nation," says its initiator, who was himself a veteran battle commander.
The 46-acre project built in the green suburb of Colombo, preserving the natural environment lies in the borders of the Aththidiya Bird Sanctuary. According to Major Kaushal Weerasinghe- construction coordinator of the 'Mihindu Seth Medura' the project's initial work was completed at a cost of Rs. 135Mn.
Secretary Defence Mr. Gotabaya Rajapaksa sees the need to engage Sri Lankan philanthropists, both locally and abroad, in this venture that will help weave the Sri Lankan social fabric with a rich commitment to serve those who have given selfless service to their country.
"The concept is unique. This is to assist in every endeavor for disable war heroes, who requires maximum attention to reinstate themselves to normalcy with their family and friends", said Major DMDJ Dissanayake -medical officer in-charge of the patients.
Cabinet Ministers, the Chief of Defence Staff including three forces Commanders, Inspector General of Police, Senior Defence Ministerial officials and relatives of disabled war heroes were also present at the occasion.
"Pillay's statement a dangerous precedence to undermine credibility and objectives of UN mechanism- Permanent Representative
http://www.defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20110531_04
"Pillay's statement a dangerous precedence to undermine credibility and objectives of UN mechanism- Permanent Representative
"We call upon the member states of the World Body to unite against such possible machinations, by disallowing negative precedents to become concretised. It may wrongly be us today and one of you tomorrow", stated H.E. Kshenuka Senewiratne, Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the UN, Geneva on the Statement of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Navanethem Pillay on 30 May 2011.
She also stated that such, "would establish a dangerous precedent and certainly undermine the credibility and objectives of this august body".
Full text of Statement by H.E. Kshenuka Senewiratne, Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the UN, Geneva
Mr. President,
My delegation is perplexed to note the High Commissioner's reference as stated, to the report of the Secretary General's Panel of Experts on accountability in Sri Lanka. It is widely known that the said report was borne outside of an intergovernmental process. It is a report which was initiated solely by the UNSG to advise himself on the modalities, applicable international standards and comparative experience relevant to an accountability process in respect to the conflict in Sri Lanka. It is extremely unfortunate, Mr President, that the High Commissioner has thought fit to refer to it in her report to the 17th Session of the HRC, a document which was compiled by a Panel to advise the SG, that too at his own request, and well exceeding its mandate, thereby bringing into question her objectivity. In this context, the High Commissioner has resorted to drawing on recommendations culminating from a report of a non intergovernmental process, which also has no official status in the UN system. This Council would agree that at no point has it sought this so called information referred to by the High Commissioner.
Mr. President,
Further the High Commissioner unbecomingly deems it appropriate to call for action on the recommendations of the said report which are based on unverified information and also un-sourced, and would remain so for the next 20 years. Infact the Report itself states that the facts are unsubstantiated, whereas the information being processed by Sri Lanka's domestic mechanism, has been collected through the conduct of open and transparent hearings, including from the former theatre of conflict, which would enable a careful evaluation of such material to culminate in considered conclusions.
Mr. President,
The High Commissioner continues with a seeming preoccupation of calling for the establishment of an international monitoring mechanism, which also has been recommended in the report based on unverified information, and if adhered to will call into question, the professionalism and independence of the Council. The High Commissioner through her references in the statement seems to attempt to legitimise an internal document by seeking to push it into an intergovernmental body, ignoring all relevant rules of procedure. This, Mr President, would establish a dangerous precedent and certainly undermine the credibility and objectives of this august body. We call upon the member states of the World Body to unite against such possible machinations, by disallowing negative precedents to become concretised. It may wrongly be us today and one of you tomorrow.
Mr. President,
In addition, the High Commissioner has prejudged the ability of the domestic mechanism even before it has concluded by pledging her full support to an international mechanism being established to monitor national investigations. The bona fides of her position in this regard comes into question, as the accepted practice is to provide the domestic processes adequate time and exhaust all available domestic recourse, prior to resorting to any international mechanism. This basic requirement of the need to give the domestic mechanism space, time and opportunity should be known by the High Commissioner, unless she wishes to ignore it for a reason of her own choice. The continued demonstrable lack of objectivity and impropriety on the part of the High Commissioner does not augur well on the work of her office in constructive engagement with the Government of Sri Lanka which we have consistently sought through our interactions. The unrelenting criticism, constant negativity in approach and the unwillingness to recognize the enormous strides made by the GoSL are counterproductive to the process of engagement, which has been pursued so actively by the Government with the High Commissioner.
Mr. President,
Unfortunately the High Commissioner's statement has also given the cue for similar references by some countries. We say to them that while taking cognisance of our aforesaid position, the policies of the GoSL are solely based on ensuring the welfare of its people and therefore is well aware of its responsibilities. Therefore it is time for genuine, demonstrable constructive engagement by those countries with the Government of Sri Lanka. We can only seek to look forward to the dawn of a better era of engagement with them and the High Commissioner, free from prejudice.
Thank you.
"Pillay's statement a dangerous precedence to undermine credibility and objectives of UN mechanism- Permanent Representative
"We call upon the member states of the World Body to unite against such possible machinations, by disallowing negative precedents to become concretised. It may wrongly be us today and one of you tomorrow", stated H.E. Kshenuka Senewiratne, Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the UN, Geneva on the Statement of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Navanethem Pillay on 30 May 2011.
She also stated that such, "would establish a dangerous precedent and certainly undermine the credibility and objectives of this august body".
Full text of Statement by H.E. Kshenuka Senewiratne, Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the UN, Geneva
Mr. President,
My delegation is perplexed to note the High Commissioner's reference as stated, to the report of the Secretary General's Panel of Experts on accountability in Sri Lanka. It is widely known that the said report was borne outside of an intergovernmental process. It is a report which was initiated solely by the UNSG to advise himself on the modalities, applicable international standards and comparative experience relevant to an accountability process in respect to the conflict in Sri Lanka. It is extremely unfortunate, Mr President, that the High Commissioner has thought fit to refer to it in her report to the 17th Session of the HRC, a document which was compiled by a Panel to advise the SG, that too at his own request, and well exceeding its mandate, thereby bringing into question her objectivity. In this context, the High Commissioner has resorted to drawing on recommendations culminating from a report of a non intergovernmental process, which also has no official status in the UN system. This Council would agree that at no point has it sought this so called information referred to by the High Commissioner.
Mr. President,
Further the High Commissioner unbecomingly deems it appropriate to call for action on the recommendations of the said report which are based on unverified information and also un-sourced, and would remain so for the next 20 years. Infact the Report itself states that the facts are unsubstantiated, whereas the information being processed by Sri Lanka's domestic mechanism, has been collected through the conduct of open and transparent hearings, including from the former theatre of conflict, which would enable a careful evaluation of such material to culminate in considered conclusions.
Mr. President,
The High Commissioner continues with a seeming preoccupation of calling for the establishment of an international monitoring mechanism, which also has been recommended in the report based on unverified information, and if adhered to will call into question, the professionalism and independence of the Council. The High Commissioner through her references in the statement seems to attempt to legitimise an internal document by seeking to push it into an intergovernmental body, ignoring all relevant rules of procedure. This, Mr President, would establish a dangerous precedent and certainly undermine the credibility and objectives of this august body. We call upon the member states of the World Body to unite against such possible machinations, by disallowing negative precedents to become concretised. It may wrongly be us today and one of you tomorrow.
Mr. President,
In addition, the High Commissioner has prejudged the ability of the domestic mechanism even before it has concluded by pledging her full support to an international mechanism being established to monitor national investigations. The bona fides of her position in this regard comes into question, as the accepted practice is to provide the domestic processes adequate time and exhaust all available domestic recourse, prior to resorting to any international mechanism. This basic requirement of the need to give the domestic mechanism space, time and opportunity should be known by the High Commissioner, unless she wishes to ignore it for a reason of her own choice. The continued demonstrable lack of objectivity and impropriety on the part of the High Commissioner does not augur well on the work of her office in constructive engagement with the Government of Sri Lanka which we have consistently sought through our interactions. The unrelenting criticism, constant negativity in approach and the unwillingness to recognize the enormous strides made by the GoSL are counterproductive to the process of engagement, which has been pursued so actively by the Government with the High Commissioner.
Mr. President,
Unfortunately the High Commissioner's statement has also given the cue for similar references by some countries. We say to them that while taking cognisance of our aforesaid position, the policies of the GoSL are solely based on ensuring the welfare of its people and therefore is well aware of its responsibilities. Therefore it is time for genuine, demonstrable constructive engagement by those countries with the Government of Sri Lanka. We can only seek to look forward to the dawn of a better era of engagement with them and the High Commissioner, free from prejudice.
Thank you.
Minister tells Human Rights Council 17th Session in Geneva:
http://www.dailynews.lk/2011/05/31/news01.asp
Minister tells Human Rights Council 17th Session in Geneva:
Reconciliation process, govt’s priority
*Ninety-five percent resettled
*Ex-child combatants rehabilitated
*Development programmes in N-E
The process of reconciliation is a priority for the government as it has everything to do with the people, who have now begun to enjoy the dividends of peace, Plantation Industries Minister and Presidential nominee for Human Rights Mahinda Samarasinghe told the 17th Session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva yesterday.
Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe
He said the process needs to be sustained and gradually built upon. In addition to the comprehensive programme of socio-economic development in the former theatre of conflict, the government has commenced discussions with Tamil political parties examining constitutional, legal and democratic reform. “The government has also extended an invitation to the Tamil diaspora to harness resources and talent for the betterment of Sri Lanka especially in the Northern and Eastern Provinces. We believe that of the challenges we place in the post-conflict phase healing the wounds of the recent past is important to sustained reconciliation,” the minister said.
The following is the full text of the minister’s speech:
“I wish to commend the constructive manner in which you, Mr President, have been conducting the work of the Human Rights Council. Our deliberations have been guided by you with sagacity and sensitivity, aimed at achieving the objectives of our agenda in a fair and equitable manner. You have the fullest cooperation and support of my delegation for the work of the Council.
“Consequent to the liberation of our people from the clutches of terrorism in May 2009, and mindful of the insurmountable challenges faced in its aftermath the Government of President Rajapaksa has embarked upon several initiatives in the areas of resettlement, rehabilitation, economic development, reconstruction and reconciliation to benefit those whose lives were affected by 30 years of conflict. In the immediate aftermath, the government’s priority has been the resettlement of the approximately 290,000 IDPs, while ensuring that they are provided adequate shelter, food, security and livelihood support. Today, 95 percent have been resettled.
It is envisaged to resettle the remainder, once the de-mining process is completed.
“In addition to catering to the needs of the IDPs, considerable action has been taken by the government to facilitate the restoration of normalcy in the lives of the returning IDPs. To support the returnees in their original areas of habitation, a large number of houses have been constructed in the former theatre of conflict and distributed among the resettling IDP families.
“With regard to rehabilitation, former child combatants have been rehabilitated and have been beneficiaries of educational programmes including vocational training. Of the 11,644 ex-combatants who surrendered or were arrested at the end of the conflict, 6,530 have already been rehabilitated and reintegrated into society. There is even a large number who have qualified for admission to universities in the country. The government is in the process of working towards the release of all remaining ex-combatants undergoing rehabilitation on a staggered basis, commensurate with their culpability with terrorist activity.
“Considering that large parts of Sri Lanka’s Northern and Eastern Provinces were denied infrastructure development by the unlawful presence and activities of the terrorists, the government is implementing a comprehensive development programme, targeting these two Provinces in particular, to enable their rapid reintegration and contribution to the national economy.
“The process of reconciliation is priority for the government as it has everything to do with the people, who have now begun to enjoy the dividends of peace. This process needs to be sustained and gradually built upon. In addition to the comprehensive programme of socio economic development in the former theatre of conflict, the government has commenced discussions with Tamil political parties examining constitutional, legal, and democratic reform. The government has also extended an invitation to the Tamil diaspora to harness resources and talent for the betterment of Sri Lanka, especially in the Northern and Eastern provinces.
We believe that of the challenges we face in the post-conflict phase healing the wounds of the recent past is important to sustained reconciliation.
“It is to address this challenge, Mr President, that the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) was established in May 2010 by His Excellency the President founded upon the principle of restorative justice, and focusing on identification of those responsible for past events related to the conflict: Its work commenced three months later.
“It is important to remember that this domestic process was established and commenced work prior to the establishment of the advisory Panel of the UN Secretary General. You will, no doubt, appreciate, that the process of reconciliation must also involve truth, justice and reparation.
The LLRC is proceeding in this direction as it has been engaging in hearing the experience of affected persons, listening to their stories, examining them to elicit the truth and draw possible investigative material to enable further follow-up action.
“Despite the repetitive clarion calls for accountability, we have taken on the responsibility to examine the conflict which lasted nearly three decades, in a holistic manner, with a view to prescribing remedial action that will prevent any further violence in our country. Having commenced its substantive work in August 2010, this domestic process has yet to complete one year, and similar processes elsewhere, as you very well know, have taken far longer.
“In this context it is disconcerting to note the haste with which some have sought to usurp the government of Sri Lanka’s prerogative in deciding its domestic process. Undoubtedly, there is no one international panacea that can be applied to such a complex set of domestic issues. We firmly believe that our home-grown process is capable of addressing the nuances of our unique situation.
The LLRC which was earlier scheduled to conclude its work this month, has sought and received an extension of its tenure by six months, to examine further relevant testimony and information which have come to light. We urge those critics, through you Mr President, to desist from arriving at hasty conclusions, and afford Sri Lanka the time, space and opportunity it needs to complete our domestic process.
“Pursuant to the interim recommendations of the (LLRC) in September 2010, the Inter Agency Advisory Committee (IAAC) was established to facilitate the expeditious implementation of LLRC recommendations. These included matters related to the detention of ex-combatants, land, law and order, administration, language, socio-economic and livelihood issues. The IAAC has facilitated the establishment of a speedy mechanism to which the LLRC can channel the complaints received with a possibility of immediate investigation and remedial action. The Attorney General in this regard, is empowered to institute criminal proceedings based on the material collected during the course of the sittings of the LLRC. It is with great satisfaction that we note the expeditious implementation of the recommendations made by the LLRC.
“Some of the recommendations already implemented include the reduction of High Security Zones, the closure of the Omanthai detention centre, the release of a large number of ex-combatants, the resolution of land disputes and the swift steps taken to ensure that no groups carry firearms with a deadline for the surrender of illegal weapons.
“As I informed this august body in March, Sri Lanka’s steadfast commitment to the further promotion and protection of human rights is enshrined in the proposed National Action Plan for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights. This action plan was developed through a consultative, participatory process which included the participation of civil society actors on an equal footing with government. I am pleased to announce that this Action Plan has now been submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers for their consideration.
“With the adoption of the 18th amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka in September 2010, work has commenced to establish the independent Commissions. Among these are the Permanent Commission to investigate allegations of bribery and corruption, the Public Service Commission and the Finance Commission. As I informed this Council in March 2011, the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka has been re-established and is now fully functional. The Human Rights Commission has, in fact, just taken proactive steps to inquire into allegations of rights violations of persons affected by the conflict, including the displaced.
“I believe it is appropriate to share our perspective on the UN system, considering that Sri Lanka has been an active member of the World Body. Sri Lanka takes seriously its rights, obligations and duties and accords great importance to its engagement with the United Nations system and especially with this august body.
It is in this spirit of constructive engagement that we have periodically kept the Member States, Observers and the High Commissioner for Human Rights briefed throughout on the conflict and post conflict developments and measures put in place to promote and protect human rights in Sri Lanka.
In addition, we submitted ourselves to the UPR and have been actively participating in the examination of Sri Lanka’s reports to treaty bodies in keeping with its obligations. Further, UN personnel and the international community directly participated in such bodies as the Consultative Committee for Humanitarian Affairs. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with the Council, the High Commissioner and all special procedures and mechanisms in a spirit of mutual respect, openness and constructive cooperation.
“It may be recalled that I informed the council of the domestic process that the government of Sri Lanka has put into place to move towards reconciliation. Despite the fact that this domestic process had commenced its work, a decision was taken to appoint a panel of experts solely for the purpose of advising the UNSG.
“Sri Lanka however, regrets the procedural and substantive anomalies in the manifestly flawed report ostensibly compiled as an advisory document to the highest office of the UN, invoking a procedure outside the established intergovernmental process. Consequently in an unusual turn of events the report was made public simultaneously with a statement being issued that the report was being carefully reviewed. “I would strongly commend to this Council that this kind of irregular practice be discouraged as this might well lead to established procedure being circumvented arbitrarily. It is also regrettable that the Panel has acted outside its jurisdiction in excess of its mandate.
“Moreover, Mr President, statements attributable to the Office of the High Commissioner having worryingly given rise to misgivings as to a lack of objectivity and contain prejudgment of the domestic mechanism established by the government, even before it has concluded its work.
It is undeniable that the humanitarian operations in Sri Lanka resulted in the rescue of over 290,000 persons - innocent civilians - held hostage by a terrorist organization proscribed in over 30 countries. It is well to remember that in the wake of the September 11 tragedy, the UN invoked the right of self-defence and called upon the international community to neutralise or combat such terrorism by non-state actors by its resolutions 1368 and 1373 of September 2001.
“The humanitarian operation was therefore a part of an act of the sovereign and its people in the wake of terrorist aggression. It is equally undeniable that Sri Lanka has taken definite steps at great cost to resettle and rebuild the lives of the people in the conflict-affected area. Finally, it is readily apparent to all that the military capability of the terrorists to launch any offensive against the people and Government of Sri Lanka has been completely degraded.
“Therefore, the recent characterization by the HCHR of the very nature of the operation as one which was conducted “under the guise of fighting terrorism”, is most unfortunate. Such a characterization is wholly misplaced, as the community of nations was well aware that Sri Lanka was combating one of the most ruthless terrorist organisations in the world.
“These statements also concluded that the conflict cost the lives of tens of thousands of civilians - the basis for such a statistical assumption not being revealed.
“Unverified information being used in this manner is totally unwarranted and gives rise to serious concerns as to whether the Sri Lankan situation is being considered in an objective manner. Mr. President, having regard to the vicissitudes of the manner in which Sri Lanka has been treated we seek the equal protection of the UN system in our engagement.
“It is of paramount importance that high offices of the UN System are scrupulously impartial, independent and transparent, and are seen to be so. Any perceived lack of these fundamental characteristics would affect the effectiveness of such critical institutions.
The work of the Special Procedure mandate holders and working groups being facilitated by the OHCHR, could also be seen to be compromised by such perceived shortcomings. It is also of concern to Sri Lanka that, while there has been robust engagement with the intergovernmental processes of the United Nations, any move to undermine it through attempts to formalise initiatives which arose outside intergovernmental processes, will entrench patently flawed procedure. We have every confidence that such unusual procedures will not find accommodation within this Council.
“In conclusion, Sri Lanka looks forward to continuing its constructive dialogue in the spirit of respect, cooperation and reciprocity with the HRC in particular, the UN system in general and its other international partners.”
Minister tells Human Rights Council 17th Session in Geneva:
Reconciliation process, govt’s priority
*Ninety-five percent resettled
*Ex-child combatants rehabilitated
*Development programmes in N-E
The process of reconciliation is a priority for the government as it has everything to do with the people, who have now begun to enjoy the dividends of peace, Plantation Industries Minister and Presidential nominee for Human Rights Mahinda Samarasinghe told the 17th Session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva yesterday.
Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe
He said the process needs to be sustained and gradually built upon. In addition to the comprehensive programme of socio-economic development in the former theatre of conflict, the government has commenced discussions with Tamil political parties examining constitutional, legal and democratic reform. “The government has also extended an invitation to the Tamil diaspora to harness resources and talent for the betterment of Sri Lanka especially in the Northern and Eastern Provinces. We believe that of the challenges we place in the post-conflict phase healing the wounds of the recent past is important to sustained reconciliation,” the minister said.
The following is the full text of the minister’s speech:
“I wish to commend the constructive manner in which you, Mr President, have been conducting the work of the Human Rights Council. Our deliberations have been guided by you with sagacity and sensitivity, aimed at achieving the objectives of our agenda in a fair and equitable manner. You have the fullest cooperation and support of my delegation for the work of the Council.
“Consequent to the liberation of our people from the clutches of terrorism in May 2009, and mindful of the insurmountable challenges faced in its aftermath the Government of President Rajapaksa has embarked upon several initiatives in the areas of resettlement, rehabilitation, economic development, reconstruction and reconciliation to benefit those whose lives were affected by 30 years of conflict. In the immediate aftermath, the government’s priority has been the resettlement of the approximately 290,000 IDPs, while ensuring that they are provided adequate shelter, food, security and livelihood support. Today, 95 percent have been resettled.
It is envisaged to resettle the remainder, once the de-mining process is completed.
“In addition to catering to the needs of the IDPs, considerable action has been taken by the government to facilitate the restoration of normalcy in the lives of the returning IDPs. To support the returnees in their original areas of habitation, a large number of houses have been constructed in the former theatre of conflict and distributed among the resettling IDP families.
“With regard to rehabilitation, former child combatants have been rehabilitated and have been beneficiaries of educational programmes including vocational training. Of the 11,644 ex-combatants who surrendered or were arrested at the end of the conflict, 6,530 have already been rehabilitated and reintegrated into society. There is even a large number who have qualified for admission to universities in the country. The government is in the process of working towards the release of all remaining ex-combatants undergoing rehabilitation on a staggered basis, commensurate with their culpability with terrorist activity.
“Considering that large parts of Sri Lanka’s Northern and Eastern Provinces were denied infrastructure development by the unlawful presence and activities of the terrorists, the government is implementing a comprehensive development programme, targeting these two Provinces in particular, to enable their rapid reintegration and contribution to the national economy.
“The process of reconciliation is priority for the government as it has everything to do with the people, who have now begun to enjoy the dividends of peace. This process needs to be sustained and gradually built upon. In addition to the comprehensive programme of socio economic development in the former theatre of conflict, the government has commenced discussions with Tamil political parties examining constitutional, legal, and democratic reform. The government has also extended an invitation to the Tamil diaspora to harness resources and talent for the betterment of Sri Lanka, especially in the Northern and Eastern provinces.
We believe that of the challenges we face in the post-conflict phase healing the wounds of the recent past is important to sustained reconciliation.
“It is to address this challenge, Mr President, that the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) was established in May 2010 by His Excellency the President founded upon the principle of restorative justice, and focusing on identification of those responsible for past events related to the conflict: Its work commenced three months later.
“It is important to remember that this domestic process was established and commenced work prior to the establishment of the advisory Panel of the UN Secretary General. You will, no doubt, appreciate, that the process of reconciliation must also involve truth, justice and reparation.
The LLRC is proceeding in this direction as it has been engaging in hearing the experience of affected persons, listening to their stories, examining them to elicit the truth and draw possible investigative material to enable further follow-up action.
“Despite the repetitive clarion calls for accountability, we have taken on the responsibility to examine the conflict which lasted nearly three decades, in a holistic manner, with a view to prescribing remedial action that will prevent any further violence in our country. Having commenced its substantive work in August 2010, this domestic process has yet to complete one year, and similar processes elsewhere, as you very well know, have taken far longer.
“In this context it is disconcerting to note the haste with which some have sought to usurp the government of Sri Lanka’s prerogative in deciding its domestic process. Undoubtedly, there is no one international panacea that can be applied to such a complex set of domestic issues. We firmly believe that our home-grown process is capable of addressing the nuances of our unique situation.
The LLRC which was earlier scheduled to conclude its work this month, has sought and received an extension of its tenure by six months, to examine further relevant testimony and information which have come to light. We urge those critics, through you Mr President, to desist from arriving at hasty conclusions, and afford Sri Lanka the time, space and opportunity it needs to complete our domestic process.
“Pursuant to the interim recommendations of the (LLRC) in September 2010, the Inter Agency Advisory Committee (IAAC) was established to facilitate the expeditious implementation of LLRC recommendations. These included matters related to the detention of ex-combatants, land, law and order, administration, language, socio-economic and livelihood issues. The IAAC has facilitated the establishment of a speedy mechanism to which the LLRC can channel the complaints received with a possibility of immediate investigation and remedial action. The Attorney General in this regard, is empowered to institute criminal proceedings based on the material collected during the course of the sittings of the LLRC. It is with great satisfaction that we note the expeditious implementation of the recommendations made by the LLRC.
“Some of the recommendations already implemented include the reduction of High Security Zones, the closure of the Omanthai detention centre, the release of a large number of ex-combatants, the resolution of land disputes and the swift steps taken to ensure that no groups carry firearms with a deadline for the surrender of illegal weapons.
“As I informed this august body in March, Sri Lanka’s steadfast commitment to the further promotion and protection of human rights is enshrined in the proposed National Action Plan for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights. This action plan was developed through a consultative, participatory process which included the participation of civil society actors on an equal footing with government. I am pleased to announce that this Action Plan has now been submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers for their consideration.
“With the adoption of the 18th amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka in September 2010, work has commenced to establish the independent Commissions. Among these are the Permanent Commission to investigate allegations of bribery and corruption, the Public Service Commission and the Finance Commission. As I informed this Council in March 2011, the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka has been re-established and is now fully functional. The Human Rights Commission has, in fact, just taken proactive steps to inquire into allegations of rights violations of persons affected by the conflict, including the displaced.
“I believe it is appropriate to share our perspective on the UN system, considering that Sri Lanka has been an active member of the World Body. Sri Lanka takes seriously its rights, obligations and duties and accords great importance to its engagement with the United Nations system and especially with this august body.
It is in this spirit of constructive engagement that we have periodically kept the Member States, Observers and the High Commissioner for Human Rights briefed throughout on the conflict and post conflict developments and measures put in place to promote and protect human rights in Sri Lanka.
In addition, we submitted ourselves to the UPR and have been actively participating in the examination of Sri Lanka’s reports to treaty bodies in keeping with its obligations. Further, UN personnel and the international community directly participated in such bodies as the Consultative Committee for Humanitarian Affairs. We look forward to continuing our dialogue with the Council, the High Commissioner and all special procedures and mechanisms in a spirit of mutual respect, openness and constructive cooperation.
“It may be recalled that I informed the council of the domestic process that the government of Sri Lanka has put into place to move towards reconciliation. Despite the fact that this domestic process had commenced its work, a decision was taken to appoint a panel of experts solely for the purpose of advising the UNSG.
“Sri Lanka however, regrets the procedural and substantive anomalies in the manifestly flawed report ostensibly compiled as an advisory document to the highest office of the UN, invoking a procedure outside the established intergovernmental process. Consequently in an unusual turn of events the report was made public simultaneously with a statement being issued that the report was being carefully reviewed. “I would strongly commend to this Council that this kind of irregular practice be discouraged as this might well lead to established procedure being circumvented arbitrarily. It is also regrettable that the Panel has acted outside its jurisdiction in excess of its mandate.
“Moreover, Mr President, statements attributable to the Office of the High Commissioner having worryingly given rise to misgivings as to a lack of objectivity and contain prejudgment of the domestic mechanism established by the government, even before it has concluded its work.
It is undeniable that the humanitarian operations in Sri Lanka resulted in the rescue of over 290,000 persons - innocent civilians - held hostage by a terrorist organization proscribed in over 30 countries. It is well to remember that in the wake of the September 11 tragedy, the UN invoked the right of self-defence and called upon the international community to neutralise or combat such terrorism by non-state actors by its resolutions 1368 and 1373 of September 2001.
“The humanitarian operation was therefore a part of an act of the sovereign and its people in the wake of terrorist aggression. It is equally undeniable that Sri Lanka has taken definite steps at great cost to resettle and rebuild the lives of the people in the conflict-affected area. Finally, it is readily apparent to all that the military capability of the terrorists to launch any offensive against the people and Government of Sri Lanka has been completely degraded.
“Therefore, the recent characterization by the HCHR of the very nature of the operation as one which was conducted “under the guise of fighting terrorism”, is most unfortunate. Such a characterization is wholly misplaced, as the community of nations was well aware that Sri Lanka was combating one of the most ruthless terrorist organisations in the world.
“These statements also concluded that the conflict cost the lives of tens of thousands of civilians - the basis for such a statistical assumption not being revealed.
“Unverified information being used in this manner is totally unwarranted and gives rise to serious concerns as to whether the Sri Lankan situation is being considered in an objective manner. Mr. President, having regard to the vicissitudes of the manner in which Sri Lanka has been treated we seek the equal protection of the UN system in our engagement.
“It is of paramount importance that high offices of the UN System are scrupulously impartial, independent and transparent, and are seen to be so. Any perceived lack of these fundamental characteristics would affect the effectiveness of such critical institutions.
The work of the Special Procedure mandate holders and working groups being facilitated by the OHCHR, could also be seen to be compromised by such perceived shortcomings. It is also of concern to Sri Lanka that, while there has been robust engagement with the intergovernmental processes of the United Nations, any move to undermine it through attempts to formalise initiatives which arose outside intergovernmental processes, will entrench patently flawed procedure. We have every confidence that such unusual procedures will not find accommodation within this Council.
“In conclusion, Sri Lanka looks forward to continuing its constructive dialogue in the spirit of respect, cooperation and reciprocity with the HRC in particular, the UN system in general and its other international partners.”
The greatest gratitude
http://www.defence.lk/new.asp?fname=20110530_04
The greatest gratitude
www.defence.lk">In the light of many noble aspirations at providing comfortable life for the disabled soldiers, "Mihindu Seth Medura"; best be described as a "Healing Home" has been made into reality, bestowing upon the needy war heroes who were maimed in the face of terror, and with no helping hand to assist them in basic day today needs.
Much hard effort had been expended and many forces have pull to-gather with a single purpose before this result come to pass, and now we can say a promising initiative has been taken to show the greatest gratitude of a nation, to respect, honour and empower those who made great sacrifices for the nation, but expected nothing in return.
In the history of war, not every generation has been summoned to defend our country in its hour of need. Yet, every generation should feel that call has done so with valour, courage and sacrifices.
Aim
The aim is to make them feel that they have never been forgotten by the society, and to assist them to meet challenges more confidently through a systematic approach addressing all possible means. www.defence.lk">
Background
The 46-acre "Mihindu Seth Medura" is the brainchild of Secretary Defence has been built in the green suburb of Colombo, on the borders of the Aththidiya Bird Sanctuary. Tranquility of Aththidiya, suits best for the purpose as the nature will reinforce the healing powers while all other sophistications available in this institution.
"Mihindu Seth Medura", the first of its kind in South Asia, this special institution will be a home away from home for over 50 valiant
war heroes, carefully identified as the most needed in terms of special care and comfort.
Soldiers who have been sustained with life altering injuries require a lifetime of care. These brave men risked life and limb to save the country. They deserve the very best health care mainly apart from other issues. All in all the "Mihindu Seth Medura"is a place where war heroes will be watched over harmoniously for the rest of their lives. It is equipped with all what they need under one roof, including well trained professional staff.
Speaking to defence.lk, Major Ebraheem of SL Army, who is now being looked after at the "Mihindu Seth Medura" said "I have no words to tell you but, this is nothing less than a living heaven for all of us. We have all what we need here and we are being well looked after." he said.
The spiritual aspect of soldier is much respected, and given room for everyone to worship, meditate or to do any other religious activities as they desire. The environment too adds greater value creating an appropriate atmosphere for the purpose.
Facilities and Staff
The facility is absolutely unique in every dimension, every soldier is provided with an air-conditioned luxury room including a small pantry with essential kitchen appliances, attached bath room, clinical bed, TV, internet, and much more. Everything is of best brands and highest quality as to show them that they are being well looked after.
The cafeteria brings togetherness alive, allowing more space for them to interact with other comrades, family members, friends and other interested parties as well.
The self-sustaining staff adds much value to the initial concept, while making good example to the soldiers, they are so tasked to gradually empower soldiers to deal with own matters alone and with confidence. www.defence.lk">
Responsibility for all
As a nation, we are deeply indebted to these brave men for all their efforts making the motherland free from terror. His Excellency President Rajapaksa has mentioned in his Ranaviru Day message, the responsibility of nation towards the war heroes. The President said "The entire nation should come forward and assist the families of those brave soldiers who died or were maimed in this great struggle for peace and unity. This is our duty and responsibility. I trust both the Government and citizens will look after the welfare of Ranaviru families, to make them feel secure with the assurance that that society at large has not forgotten them".
However, one mustn't be awaited till the head of state remind the noble duty towards our valiant men and women. Thus, it is our moral responsibility to look after such great heroes for years to come.
The greatest gratitude
www.defence.lk">In the light of many noble aspirations at providing comfortable life for the disabled soldiers, "Mihindu Seth Medura"; best be described as a "Healing Home" has been made into reality, bestowing upon the needy war heroes who were maimed in the face of terror, and with no helping hand to assist them in basic day today needs.
Much hard effort had been expended and many forces have pull to-gather with a single purpose before this result come to pass, and now we can say a promising initiative has been taken to show the greatest gratitude of a nation, to respect, honour and empower those who made great sacrifices for the nation, but expected nothing in return.
In the history of war, not every generation has been summoned to defend our country in its hour of need. Yet, every generation should feel that call has done so with valour, courage and sacrifices.
Aim
The aim is to make them feel that they have never been forgotten by the society, and to assist them to meet challenges more confidently through a systematic approach addressing all possible means. www.defence.lk">
Background
The 46-acre "Mihindu Seth Medura" is the brainchild of Secretary Defence has been built in the green suburb of Colombo, on the borders of the Aththidiya Bird Sanctuary. Tranquility of Aththidiya, suits best for the purpose as the nature will reinforce the healing powers while all other sophistications available in this institution.
"Mihindu Seth Medura", the first of its kind in South Asia, this special institution will be a home away from home for over 50 valiant
war heroes, carefully identified as the most needed in terms of special care and comfort.
Soldiers who have been sustained with life altering injuries require a lifetime of care. These brave men risked life and limb to save the country. They deserve the very best health care mainly apart from other issues. All in all the "Mihindu Seth Medura"is a place where war heroes will be watched over harmoniously for the rest of their lives. It is equipped with all what they need under one roof, including well trained professional staff.
Speaking to defence.lk, Major Ebraheem of SL Army, who is now being looked after at the "Mihindu Seth Medura" said "I have no words to tell you but, this is nothing less than a living heaven for all of us. We have all what we need here and we are being well looked after." he said.
The spiritual aspect of soldier is much respected, and given room for everyone to worship, meditate or to do any other religious activities as they desire. The environment too adds greater value creating an appropriate atmosphere for the purpose.
Facilities and Staff
The facility is absolutely unique in every dimension, every soldier is provided with an air-conditioned luxury room including a small pantry with essential kitchen appliances, attached bath room, clinical bed, TV, internet, and much more. Everything is of best brands and highest quality as to show them that they are being well looked after.
The cafeteria brings togetherness alive, allowing more space for them to interact with other comrades, family members, friends and other interested parties as well.
The self-sustaining staff adds much value to the initial concept, while making good example to the soldiers, they are so tasked to gradually empower soldiers to deal with own matters alone and with confidence. www.defence.lk">
Responsibility for all
As a nation, we are deeply indebted to these brave men for all their efforts making the motherland free from terror. His Excellency President Rajapaksa has mentioned in his Ranaviru Day message, the responsibility of nation towards the war heroes. The President said "The entire nation should come forward and assist the families of those brave soldiers who died or were maimed in this great struggle for peace and unity. This is our duty and responsibility. I trust both the Government and citizens will look after the welfare of Ranaviru families, to make them feel secure with the assurance that that society at large has not forgotten them".
However, one mustn't be awaited till the head of state remind the noble duty towards our valiant men and women. Thus, it is our moral responsibility to look after such great heroes for years to come.
Sunday, May 29, 2011
North poised for greater economic growth -CB
A fast recovery of economic activities is taking place in the Northern Province since the end of the conflict in May 2009, stated the Central Bank. The Northern Province development programme, “Uthuru Wasanthaya” (Wadakkil Wasantham), which was initiated just after the ending of the conflict to expedite resettlement, support livelihood and development of infrastructure in the province has been continuing successfully. The gross extent of land used for paddy cultivation in the Northern Province increased by 179 per cent to 67,003 hectares in the 2010/11 Maha season from 24,051 hectares in the 2009/10 Maha season. This resulted in increasing paddy production to 205,507 mt in 2010/11 a 112 percent increase compared to the 2009/10 Maha season. The highest increases in the extent of paddy cultivation were reported in Kilinochchi and Vavuniya districts.It is also estimated that the total extent of land used for cultivation of other food crops (OFC) including vegetables also increased significantly in the Northern Province by 172 per cent to 20,043 ha in the 2010/11 Maha season from 7,342 hectares in the 2009/10 Maha season. Further, the extent of land cultivated increased in relation to Big onions, Maize, Cowpea, Black gram and Ground nuts amongst other food crops. In addition, the total marine fish production increased by 58 per cent to 33,600 mt in 2010. A substantial increase in fish production is expected in 2011.Banking facilities have been strengthened in the Northern Province by establishing 37 new bank branches and 22 extension offices from May 2009 to May 2011. At the same time, co-operatives and supermarket chains have increased their ties with farmers, to purchase their produce.The number of telephone connections in the Northern Province, including wire lines, wireless, local loops, CDMA and payphones increased by 89 per cent to 74,742 in 2009 from 46,919 in 2008, while the vehicle stock in the Northern Province increased to 47,031 in 2009 from 39,740 in 2008, an increase of 18 per cent.
http://www.dailynews.lk/2011/05/30/news46.asp
Devananda instructs officials:
Resettle Jaffna's displaced Muslims
Traditional Industries and Small Enterprise Development Minister Douglas Devananda addressing the development council meeting at the Jaffna Divisional Secretariat on May 9, instructed officials to take immediate steps necessary, to resettle Muslims unjustifiably chased away from Jaffna peninsula by the LTTE as well as those displaced due to the three decade conflict.
The minister said that the allocation of funds for development activities needed to be done meaningfully and with commitment.
"It is the duty as well as the responsibility of the officials to supervise and monitor these activities consistently for the smooth progress and completion within the stipulated time frame," he said. Devananda said that he had been working in conjunction with the Lands Ministry for allotting state lands to the landless, lands for kovils and those needed for public use.
The minister said he had already taken action to submit a Cabinet paper in this regard. Steps would soon be taken to pay Rs 25,000 to the re-settled in Jaffna Divisional Secretariat Division who had not received this sum, the minister said. The minister emphasized that housing schemes would be initiated in accordance with government policies and also taking into consideration the population density of the areas.
Special allocation of funds for water supply and drainage too would be made up, the minister added.
Several state officials including the divisional secretary, Jaffna, representatives from voluntary organizations and civil organizations participated.
Devananda instructs officials:
Resettle Jaffna's displaced Muslims
Traditional Industries and Small Enterprise Development Minister Douglas Devananda addressing the development council meeting at the Jaffna Divisional Secretariat on May 9, instructed officials to take immediate steps necessary, to resettle Muslims unjustifiably chased away from Jaffna peninsula by the LTTE as well as those displaced due to the three decade conflict.
The minister said that the allocation of funds for development activities needed to be done meaningfully and with commitment.
"It is the duty as well as the responsibility of the officials to supervise and monitor these activities consistently for the smooth progress and completion within the stipulated time frame," he said. Devananda said that he had been working in conjunction with the Lands Ministry for allotting state lands to the landless, lands for kovils and those needed for public use.
The minister said he had already taken action to submit a Cabinet paper in this regard. Steps would soon be taken to pay Rs 25,000 to the re-settled in Jaffna Divisional Secretariat Division who had not received this sum, the minister said. The minister emphasized that housing schemes would be initiated in accordance with government policies and also taking into consideration the population density of the areas.
Special allocation of funds for water supply and drainage too would be made up, the minister added.
Several state officials including the divisional secretary, Jaffna, representatives from voluntary organizations and civil organizations participated.
IOM in unique project to assist ex-LTTE cadres
http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=26582
IOM in unique project to assist ex-LTTE cadresMay 29, 2011, 10:01 pm
Richard Danziger discusses on-going profiling of those who fought the Sri Lankan State
by Shamindra Ferdinando
Ex-LTTE combatants can now benefit from a unique project executed by the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) with the support of international donors. The scheme launched in the aftermath of the conclusion of the war in May 2009, provides assistance to those who once fought for the LTTE.
Richard Danziger, Chief of Mission, IOM Sri Lanka, told The Island that they had designed and implemented a comprehensive Information, Counselling, and Referral Services (ICRS) programme for ex-LTTE personnel. Danziger said that ICRS project would help the ex-combatants to return to civilian life in a dignified and timely manner. That would definitely contribute to the process of peace and national reconciliation, thereby building a positive environment for the resumption of economic activities in war torn areas, Danziger said.
Danziger was speaking after the last week’s IOM’s 60th anniversary celebrations. Danziger revealed that as at May 16, 2011, 1,730 ex-LTTE personnel had received individual assistance, through the ICRC project.
On the invitation of the government of the Government of Sri Lanka, the IOM has so far profiled about 6,800 ex-LTTE personnel. Danziger said that it was an ongoing project conducted with the blessings of the government. He said: "As of today, more than 6726 former LTTE cadres have been profiled by IOM. Each beneficiary receives individual support following their release from the government’s rehabilitation facilities. They can apply for a small grant to set up a business, find employment, start formal education or be engaged in apprenticeships and on-the-job training schemes. Similarly, through the ICRS referral mechanism, beneficiaries are put in contact with job vacancies, vocational training opportunities and some of the specialist services that they may need to access such as health, psycho-social and legal support. As at 16 May 2011, 1,730 former combatants have been given individual assistance through the ICRS mechanism."
Danziger said that USAID, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom had provided funds for the programme. According to him, the IOM worked very closely with the Commissioner General of Rehabilitation to meet the challenging task of post-war rehabilitation of the combatants.
At the conclusion of the war, the Sri Lankan military held as many as 11,700 LTTE cadres taken on the Vanni front, whereas there were several hundred held on detention orders over the years.
Danziger said that the IOM would help reintegrate the remaining ex-combatants with the support of Commissioner General of Rehabilitation. "This year, with new funding, IOM is looking at initiating community development projects targeting the areas where ex-LTTE personnel have returned. In addition, IOM has planned to carry out a series of workshops in the area of reconciliation to facilitate the ongoing reintegration process," the IOM chief said.
Commenting on the challenges faced by the ongoing project, Danziger said: "One major challenge is the relative absence of information on the ICRS programme at ground level in the Northern and Eastern Provinces. This is an issue the IOM and the Commissioner General of Rehabilitation are trying to address. The remote locations where some of the ICRS clients (read as ex-LTTE personnel) live is also a factor that can limit the speedy delivery of ICRS support. Finally, in spite of generous support received by the current donors, there remain funding constraints which, unless addressed, will limit our ability to provide support to all former LTTE cadres."
IOM in unique project to assist ex-LTTE cadresMay 29, 2011, 10:01 pm
Richard Danziger discusses on-going profiling of those who fought the Sri Lankan State
by Shamindra Ferdinando
Ex-LTTE combatants can now benefit from a unique project executed by the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) with the support of international donors. The scheme launched in the aftermath of the conclusion of the war in May 2009, provides assistance to those who once fought for the LTTE.
Richard Danziger, Chief of Mission, IOM Sri Lanka, told The Island that they had designed and implemented a comprehensive Information, Counselling, and Referral Services (ICRS) programme for ex-LTTE personnel. Danziger said that ICRS project would help the ex-combatants to return to civilian life in a dignified and timely manner. That would definitely contribute to the process of peace and national reconciliation, thereby building a positive environment for the resumption of economic activities in war torn areas, Danziger said.
Danziger was speaking after the last week’s IOM’s 60th anniversary celebrations. Danziger revealed that as at May 16, 2011, 1,730 ex-LTTE personnel had received individual assistance, through the ICRC project.
On the invitation of the government of the Government of Sri Lanka, the IOM has so far profiled about 6,800 ex-LTTE personnel. Danziger said that it was an ongoing project conducted with the blessings of the government. He said: "As of today, more than 6726 former LTTE cadres have been profiled by IOM. Each beneficiary receives individual support following their release from the government’s rehabilitation facilities. They can apply for a small grant to set up a business, find employment, start formal education or be engaged in apprenticeships and on-the-job training schemes. Similarly, through the ICRS referral mechanism, beneficiaries are put in contact with job vacancies, vocational training opportunities and some of the specialist services that they may need to access such as health, psycho-social and legal support. As at 16 May 2011, 1,730 former combatants have been given individual assistance through the ICRS mechanism."
Danziger said that USAID, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom had provided funds for the programme. According to him, the IOM worked very closely with the Commissioner General of Rehabilitation to meet the challenging task of post-war rehabilitation of the combatants.
At the conclusion of the war, the Sri Lankan military held as many as 11,700 LTTE cadres taken on the Vanni front, whereas there were several hundred held on detention orders over the years.
Danziger said that the IOM would help reintegrate the remaining ex-combatants with the support of Commissioner General of Rehabilitation. "This year, with new funding, IOM is looking at initiating community development projects targeting the areas where ex-LTTE personnel have returned. In addition, IOM has planned to carry out a series of workshops in the area of reconciliation to facilitate the ongoing reintegration process," the IOM chief said.
Commenting on the challenges faced by the ongoing project, Danziger said: "One major challenge is the relative absence of information on the ICRS programme at ground level in the Northern and Eastern Provinces. This is an issue the IOM and the Commissioner General of Rehabilitation are trying to address. The remote locations where some of the ICRS clients (read as ex-LTTE personnel) live is also a factor that can limit the speedy delivery of ICRS support. Finally, in spite of generous support received by the current donors, there remain funding constraints which, unless addressed, will limit our ability to provide support to all former LTTE cadres."
http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=26498
"Follow the Dutch example," says govt. official - Colombo urges further probes on LTTE fund raising
"Follow the Dutch example," says govt. official - Colombo urges further probes on LTTE fund raisingMay 28, 2011, 12:00 pm
By Shamindra Ferdinando
In the wake of an unprecedented investigation undertaken by the Netherlands targeting LTTE financial networks in the Netherlands, Norway and the US, those who badger Sri Lanka over alleged war crimes should investigate accountability issues on the part of the Tamil diaspora, government sources say.
Officials of the External Affairs and Defence Ministries and the Intelligence Services say that the Dutch, through their investigation, had pointed to the LTTE financial networks funding acquisition of arms, ammunition and equipment.
They say the investigation couldn’t have come at a better time as an influential section of the international community continued to facilitate operations by the diaspora targeting post-war Sri Lanka.
They said the US and 27-nation EU should take serious note of the Dutch investigation and initiate action to put an end to diaspora operations.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa on Friday (May 27) lashed out at the LTTE rump/ Tamil diaspora at the second anniversary celebrations of Sri Lanka’s victory over the LTTE.
He alleged that they were still trying to destroy the country in spite of his efforts to move forward in the wake of restoration of peace.
Sources say due to the failure of the international community to crack down on illegal fund raising, the LTTE continued to find money even after the war ended on May 19, 2009.
Responding to a query by The Sunday Island, sources pointed out that the Netherlands had received Norway’s blessings to investigate LTTE activity in the country. It would be interesting to see whether Norway initiated an inquiry of its own and take punitive action at least now. According to a recent Radio Netherlands report Dutch authorities are currently negotiating with Sri Lankan Attorney General Mohan Peiris for permission to interrogate 13 witnesses, including Prabhakaran’s successor, Kumaran Pathmanathan, or KP, now in the protective custody of the government of Sri Lanka.
Radio Netherlands revealed that a combined Dutch team would travel to the US to interrogate, among others, Pratheepan Thavaraja, who managed a plea bargain deal with the US by admitting that he had purchased weapons for the LTTE.
Intelligence sources said that Thavaraja had been one of the key overseas operatives of the LTTE responsible for procurement of arms, ammunition and equipment.
Citing a US investigation concluded in June 2009, sources said Thavaraja had been a senior procurement agent for the LTTE involved in the purchase of improvised explosive devices, missiles, machine guns, artillery, radar, and other equipment and technology from countries around the world, including the United States.
According to US investigators, a single spreadsheet of "priority" items to purchase, which was found in Pratheepan’s laptop computer, totaled $20 million worth of arms and equipment.
It included, among others six "25mm Anti Aircraft Gun[s]" at $160,000 each, six "30 mm Twin Barrel Mounted Naval Gun[s] Type 69 (with base)" at $30,000 each, thousands of automatic rifles, millions of rounds of ammunition, grenade launchers, 50 tons of C4 explosive, five tons of "Phlegmatized RDX" explosive, 50 tons of NT — based on Chinese specification," and 50 tons of Tritonal explosive.
Pratheepan and his US based colleague Murugesu Vinayagamoorthy were also involved in the attempted bribery of purported U.S. State Department officials to remove the LTTE from the list of designated foreign terrorist organizations.
In addition, Vinayagamoorthy participated in laundering LTTE money through a Swiss bank account to covertly fund a U.S. Congressman’s trip to LTTE-controlled territory in Sri Lanka.
Sources said that Thavaraja’s lap top had revealed his relationship with the Netherlands-based Ramachandran and alleged involvement in procurement of arms.
Ramachandran is categorized by the Dutch as one of the two LTTE operatives now in their custody, with the other identified as Srirangam. The Dutch have so far questioned about 100 persons, the vast majority of them non-Sri Lankan passport holders for their involvement in fund raising operations.
"Follow the Dutch example," says govt. official - Colombo urges further probes on LTTE fund raising
"Follow the Dutch example," says govt. official - Colombo urges further probes on LTTE fund raisingMay 28, 2011, 12:00 pm
By Shamindra Ferdinando
In the wake of an unprecedented investigation undertaken by the Netherlands targeting LTTE financial networks in the Netherlands, Norway and the US, those who badger Sri Lanka over alleged war crimes should investigate accountability issues on the part of the Tamil diaspora, government sources say.
Officials of the External Affairs and Defence Ministries and the Intelligence Services say that the Dutch, through their investigation, had pointed to the LTTE financial networks funding acquisition of arms, ammunition and equipment.
They say the investigation couldn’t have come at a better time as an influential section of the international community continued to facilitate operations by the diaspora targeting post-war Sri Lanka.
They said the US and 27-nation EU should take serious note of the Dutch investigation and initiate action to put an end to diaspora operations.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa on Friday (May 27) lashed out at the LTTE rump/ Tamil diaspora at the second anniversary celebrations of Sri Lanka’s victory over the LTTE.
He alleged that they were still trying to destroy the country in spite of his efforts to move forward in the wake of restoration of peace.
Sources say due to the failure of the international community to crack down on illegal fund raising, the LTTE continued to find money even after the war ended on May 19, 2009.
Responding to a query by The Sunday Island, sources pointed out that the Netherlands had received Norway’s blessings to investigate LTTE activity in the country. It would be interesting to see whether Norway initiated an inquiry of its own and take punitive action at least now. According to a recent Radio Netherlands report Dutch authorities are currently negotiating with Sri Lankan Attorney General Mohan Peiris for permission to interrogate 13 witnesses, including Prabhakaran’s successor, Kumaran Pathmanathan, or KP, now in the protective custody of the government of Sri Lanka.
Radio Netherlands revealed that a combined Dutch team would travel to the US to interrogate, among others, Pratheepan Thavaraja, who managed a plea bargain deal with the US by admitting that he had purchased weapons for the LTTE.
Intelligence sources said that Thavaraja had been one of the key overseas operatives of the LTTE responsible for procurement of arms, ammunition and equipment.
Citing a US investigation concluded in June 2009, sources said Thavaraja had been a senior procurement agent for the LTTE involved in the purchase of improvised explosive devices, missiles, machine guns, artillery, radar, and other equipment and technology from countries around the world, including the United States.
According to US investigators, a single spreadsheet of "priority" items to purchase, which was found in Pratheepan’s laptop computer, totaled $20 million worth of arms and equipment.
It included, among others six "25mm Anti Aircraft Gun[s]" at $160,000 each, six "30 mm Twin Barrel Mounted Naval Gun[s] Type 69 (with base)" at $30,000 each, thousands of automatic rifles, millions of rounds of ammunition, grenade launchers, 50 tons of C4 explosive, five tons of "Phlegmatized RDX" explosive, 50 tons of NT — based on Chinese specification," and 50 tons of Tritonal explosive.
Pratheepan and his US based colleague Murugesu Vinayagamoorthy were also involved in the attempted bribery of purported U.S. State Department officials to remove the LTTE from the list of designated foreign terrorist organizations.
In addition, Vinayagamoorthy participated in laundering LTTE money through a Swiss bank account to covertly fund a U.S. Congressman’s trip to LTTE-controlled territory in Sri Lanka.
Sources said that Thavaraja’s lap top had revealed his relationship with the Netherlands-based Ramachandran and alleged involvement in procurement of arms.
Ramachandran is categorized by the Dutch as one of the two LTTE operatives now in their custody, with the other identified as Srirangam. The Dutch have so far questioned about 100 persons, the vast majority of them non-Sri Lankan passport holders for their involvement in fund raising operations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)